Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday July 01 2016, @01:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the those-who-can,-do,-those-who-can't,-teach dept.

In the US: this article presents an analysis how a person's chosen college major corresponds to their IQ. The interesting thing is that the relationship has remained essentially stable over the past 70 years. At the top of the list are math, science and engineering. At the absolute bottom of the list: education.

These data show that US students who choose to major in education, essentially the bulk of people who become teachers, have for at least the last seven decades been selected from students at the lower end of the academic aptitude pool. A 2010 McKinsey report (pdf) by Byron Auguste, Paul Kihn, and Matt Miller noted that top performing school systems, such as those in Singapore, Finland, and South Korea, "recruit 100% of their teacher corps from the top third of the academic cohort."

The article points out that it isn't quite this simple: Top schools place high requirements on all of their students; poor schools generally attract lower quality students in all of their programs. Still, the national averages are clear: overall, the least intelligent students go on to teach. This is an odd priority.

Educational organizations, of course, have a different view. This article claims that teacher quality declined from the 1960s through the 1990s, but has since recovered, with teachers being barely below average (48th percentile) among college graduates.

On a related note, there is a strong international correlation between teacher pay and student outcomes. The (rather obvious) theory is that higher pay attracts better candidates to the teaching profession.

No conclusions - just thought this might spark an interesting discussion...


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 01 2016, @06:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 01 2016, @06:33PM (#368544)

    "can I have a nap and then learn an hour's worth of their teaching in five minutes of reading".

    That has got to be the most narcissistic way to evaluate a teacher.
    Just because you are a special snowflake doesn't mean the teacher should neglect the entire class to cater to you.

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday July 01 2016, @07:25PM

    Oh bull shit. You do not teach to the lowest common denominator or even the median. You teach to the top and let the rest either work harder or let their grades reflect their inferior mastery of the subject. Fuck participation trophy teaching.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 01 2016, @07:38PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 01 2016, @07:38PM (#368589)

      Easy for someone (who thinks) they are at the top to say.
      Why aren't you a teacher?
      They are so over-paid and the competition is so obviously shit.
      You'd be a rockstar!

    • (Score: 2) by cmn32480 on Friday July 01 2016, @08:54PM

      by cmn32480 (443) <{cmn32480} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Friday July 01 2016, @08:54PM (#368626) Journal

      Teaching to the lowest common denominator screws everybody else. Classes do need to be divided by skill level. Elementary school is a prime example. Teaching kids to read all at the same pace is near impossible. My oldest is a first grader reading at a fourth grade level. Some of the kids in his class aren't reading at a first grade level. By dividing them by ability, you can help the kids that are having a harder time and push the kids who are really doing well.

      If they didn't do it that way (and I am thankful that they do), I'd be doing a lot more of it at home, and my kid might become a discipline problem in school due to boredom.

      I am grateful to my parents, teachers and administrators who realized that I could do the work with my eyes closed, and got me into a program that was designed to push the kids at the top of the class, even as early as second grade.

      --
      "It's a dog eat dog world, and I'm wearing Milkbone underwear" - Norm Peterson
      • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday July 01 2016, @09:26PM

        Damn but that would have been nice. I learned almost nothing outside social studies classes besides how to use commas and curse words properly during my first five years of school. My parents had already taught me that far at home by the time I started kindergarten.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.