Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday July 02 2016, @06:37AM   Printer-friendly
from the open-season dept.

A federal judge for the Eastern District of Virginia has ruled that the user of any computer that connects to the Internet should not have an expectation of privacy because computer security is ineffectual at stopping hackers.

"Hacking is much more prevalent now than it was even nine years ago, and the rise of computer hacking via the Internet has changed the public's reasonable expectations of privacy," the judge wrote. "Now, it seems unreasonable to think that a computer connected to the Web is immune from invasion. Indeed, the opposite holds true: In today's digital world, it appears to be a virtual certainty that computers accessing the Internet can—and eventually will—be hacked."

The judge argued that the FBI did not even need the original warrant to use the NIT [Network Investigative technique/Toolkit] against visitors to PlayPen, a hidden service on the Tor network that acted as a hub for child exploitation.

http://www.eweek.com/security/home-computers-connected-to-the-internet-arent-private-court-rules.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 02 2016, @06:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 02 2016, @06:54AM (#368801)

    Conspiracy theory. Yawn.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by MostCynical on Saturday July 02 2016, @08:04AM

    by MostCynical (2589) on Saturday July 02 2016, @08:04AM (#368821) Journal

    First they came for the ACs, but I was not worried, as they rarely added much to the discussion, anyway..

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex