Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Tuesday July 05 2016, @08:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-difference-does-it-make? dept.

Even as a European*, I find this of interest, because of the level of corruption it shows.

Headline: "Clinton Was 'Extremely Careless' With Email But Should Not Be Charged".

In his statement, Comey said that the FBI's investigation had found 110 emails on Clinton's servers that had contained classified information when they were sent or received, of which eight contained material at the highest classification level of "top secret." Noting that this information was being stored on "unclassified personal servers" less secure even than commercial services like Gmail and that Clinton's use of the private account was widely known, Comey said it was "possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton's personal email account." Said Comey: "Any reasonable person should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that kind of information."

So: The FBI knows that she mishandled classified information. When you receive your security clearance, you are informed of the rules and the penalties for breaking them. Storing Secret, much less Top Secret information on a civilian server outside the control of the government violates those rules.

Yet, she will not be prosecuted. She was just "careless", no big deal. Laws are for the little people.

*Full disclosure: I used to be American, but turned in my passport some years ago. Various reasons, not least of which are the US tax policies. But the politics (The Shrub, Obama, and now...possibly Hillary!) - it's like a banana republic, only with nukes.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by TheGratefulNet on Tuesday July 05 2016, @09:49PM

    by TheGratefulNet (659) on Tuesday July 05 2016, @09:49PM (#370300)

    like going after bill for a blow-job. stupid, waste of time, waste of money, tore the country apart.

    nothing happened, either. the R's tried their damned best and nothing happened.

    BECAUSE IT WAS NOTHING THAT MATTERED IN THE SCHEME OF THINGS.

    same here. 1000 other things to get worked up over. a technical rule violation is the farthest thing down in my 'do I care?' list.

    the more you guys fight, the less the country thinks of you. then again, the r's stopped caring what people (who are not already on their side) think.

    in a way, though, I encourage the pathetic little republicans to keep farking that chicken. your numbers being reduced will make everyone's life better. so, keep up the, uhm, good work, fellas. lets see how you do come election time with this tactic of yours.

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Flamebait=1, Insightful=1, Informative=3, Total=5
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 05 2016, @11:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 05 2016, @11:56PM (#370349)

    The law doesn't say you can't be a sinner. Cheating is, regretfully, legal in the USA.

    The first legal issue is that she was his subordinate at work. This tends to create a workplace environment that is banned by various laws. For example, making OTHER people in the office uncomfortable could be a hostile work environment. (you can thank the supreme court for expanding sexual harassment) BTW, this creates a blackmail risk that is a security problem.

    The second legal issue, the one that led to impeachment and the loss of his law license (bar), is that he lied about it under oath. The best you can say for Bill is that we let other people get away with this, which is the same sort of lame defense that Hillary is using. It's a huge problem that we don't prosecute everybody who does this. When there are no consequences for lying under oath, everybody does it and our court system makes horrible random bad decisions.

  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 06 2016, @01:04AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 06 2016, @01:04AM (#370384)

    This canard. Again.

    At the time he was under investigation for sexual harassment.

    How do you determine if Lewinski is relevant without an investigation?

    Was it politicized? Sure. But to mischaracterize lying under oath during the trial especially when staring down a lawsuit just marks you as a shill.

    On appeal, in the midst of his trial for impeachment based on false testimony in the Jones case (about his affair with Monica Lewinsky), Clinton was faced with the prospect of having to go under oath again and testify more about his sexual history. Instead, Clinton agreed to an out-of-court settlement, paying Jones and her lawyers $850,000 to drop the suit.

    That must have been one hell of a blowjob.