I want to hear your feedback below from everyone. Based on what we get back, we'll roll improvements into future votes, or if need be, reset the vote and do it again; I know a lot of you are active here or at least more involved, so the relatively low turnout is a warning canary for me. Leave your comments below, and expect another story in a few days to see how we're using your comments.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Rataerix on Wednesday April 23 2014, @10:24PM
I thought the voting system was fairly straight forward. I was surprised that there were so many options, I think It should have been narrowed down more before put to a general vote
(Score: 1) by NaN on Thursday April 24 2014, @10:50AM
This. The list was too long and wading through the utter crap to find and rank 9 names is just too much work. There aren't enough hours in the day as it is and I don't care enough about the name of some news site to put in that kind of effort. Build an online form with no more than a dozen options, and I'll gladly fill it out.