I want to hear your feedback below from everyone. Based on what we get back, we'll roll improvements into future votes, or if need be, reset the vote and do it again; I know a lot of you are active here or at least more involved, so the relatively low turnout is a warning canary for me. Leave your comments below, and expect another story in a few days to see how we're using your comments.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Wednesday April 23 2014, @11:56PM
^this.
Just drop it, in my opinion. I like it, it's got a good beat and it's goes good while i read by bicycle-powered light... I give it a 10 (or a 9, if that is the highest, but mine goes 11). The ONLY change i'd make is to call it soylent-green, or soylentgreen or something.
drop the vote and keep on truckin'! :)
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 1) by Jeremiah Cornelius on Thursday April 24 2014, @12:17AM
Joined 14th, I was holding out.
Never got a ballot.
I think the site should be named "Richard Harris". It's a good name, and no one is using it, anymore.
You're betting on the pantomime horse...
(Score: 2) by moondrake on Thursday April 24 2014, @08:36AM
Too late. You cannot drop it now. Either call a vote and vote or do not call vote. Dropping the vote at this moment makes the team seem incompetent and frustrates a percentage of users that DID want to vote on it.
If you are happy with the same, you should vote to keep it. If you did not, do not bitch when it gets changed.
What may be done by the staff is to call another round of voting (including new registration) for the people that somehow missed the name.