I want to hear your feedback below from everyone. Based on what we get back, we'll roll improvements into future votes, or if need be, reset the vote and do it again; I know a lot of you are active here or at least more involved, so the relatively low turnout is a warning canary for me. Leave your comments below, and expect another story in a few days to see how we're using your comments.
(Score: 1) by Bob The Cowboy on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:31AM
The name submission email did not, but this one went to spam. I didn't see it until just now. I use gmail, fwiw, so I'm willing to bet this applies to a lot of folks. Also, my eyes just sort of gloss over things like the banner on the side, so I didn't even think to look for the email.
Some notes:
The (entire) process is pretty cumbersome... not impossible, but definitely a deterrent for something that should be simple. Why not (as others have said) a set of dropdowns in the users profile pages? I get that it isn't trivial, but its probably how you'll want to do (previously mentioned) future votes.
Waaay too many names. I would have been fine with the staff narrowing it down to 20 or so.
For better or worse, probably most people are just fine with the name.
You should run a poll (yes, I know the issues/caveats): "Should we vote to change the name? [Yes/No]" If the 'Yes' camp can't muster 25%, just move on. It's just not a big enough deal that I would expect someone would stack the vote.