Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Feedback Requested: Name Vote

posted by NCommander on Wednesday April 23 2014, @10:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the apt-get-install-democracy dept.
I wanted to get feedback on how the community feels about our current name vote. There have been some concerns that we've had relatively small percentage (~10 percent) of members register to vote, and wanted to see if there was something more fundamental going on. As it is currently setup, here's how things are
  • You had to be registered by April 12th to have been included in the name vote; if you received a ballot for submission, you should have gotten ranking ballot
  • We haven't retroactively added in additional users, though it hasn't been clear that there was a hard cutoff
  • The submission phase went until the 19th, and the vote for the name will continue until the 27th
  • The current system is email only (but we are looking at getting something integrated into the website implemented for future votes)

I want to hear your feedback below from everyone. Based on what we get back, we'll roll improvements into future votes, or if need be, reset the vote and do it again; I know a lot of you are active here or at least more involved, so the relatively low turnout is a warning canary for me. Leave your comments below, and expect another story in a few days to see how we're using your comments.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Feedback Requested: Name Vote | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 156 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 24 2014, @05:32AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 24 2014, @05:32AM (#35364)

    I second this. The voting process is strangely complicated and archaic for a site catering to tech savvy readers. Additionally, it's ironic that what is theoretically an exercise in community building and participation is so siloed and non-collaborative. The approach has a late 90's Internet feel instead of modern, inviting and intuitive.

    I signed up for the vote but did not exercise it once the initial email arrived due to eyes glazing over from boredom while reading all the rules and procedures. The current name is neither good nor bad enough to rouse me onto exerting effort.
    At least it's easy to remember.