Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday April 23 2014, @09:39PM   Printer-friendly

CNN reports that the Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS) by a vote of 6 - 2 has upheld a Michigan law banning the use of racial criteria in college admissions, finding that a lower court did not have the authority to set aside the measure approved in a 2006 referendum supported by 58% of voters. "This case is not about how the debate about racial preferences should be resolved. It is about who may resolve it," wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy. "Michigan voters used the initiative system to bypass public officials who were deemed not responsive to the concerns of a majority of the voters with respect to a policy of granting race-based preferences that raises difficult and delicate issues." Kennedy's core opinion in the Michigan case seems to exalt referenda as a kind of direct democracy that the courts should be particularly reluctant to disturb. This might be a problem for same-sex marriage opponents if a future Supreme Court challenge involves a state law or constitutional amendment enacted by voters. Justice Sonia Sotomayor reacted sharply in disagreeing with the decision in a 58 page dissent. "For members of historically marginalized groups, which rely on the federal courts to protect their constitutional rights, the decision can hardly bolster hope for a vision of democracy (PDF) that preserves for all the right to participate meaningfully and equally in self-government."

The decision was the latest step in a legal and political battle over whether state colleges can use race and gender as a factor in choosing what students to admit. Michigan has said minority enrollment at its flagship university, the University of Michigan, has not gone down since the measure was passed. Civil rights groups dispute those figures and say other states have seen fewer African-American and Hispanic students attending highly competitive schools, especially in graduate level fields like law, medicine, and science. "Today's decision turns back our nation's commitment to racial equality and equal treatment under the law by sanctioning separate and unequal political processes that put undue burdens on students," National Education Association President Dennis Van Roekel said in a statement. "The Supreme Court has made it harder to advocate and, ultimately, achieve equal educational opportunity."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @12:58AM

    by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @12:58AM (#35282)

    > Already is. Throw the bastiches in jail when you can prove they've done something wrong. Is a good plan.

    The day being a legacy is illegal you'll have a point.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:25AM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:25AM (#35296) Homepage Journal
    Eh, that'd be a whole lot more valid if it weren't an extremely small portion of students. They let a hell of a lot more than legacies can account for in even when I went to school. Lately it seems like they let anyone who can beg, borrow, or steal the tuition in. Crowding and ability to learn the material be damned.
    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:31AM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:31AM (#35299) Homepage Journal

    Double comment on account of someone was distracting me and I gave up.

    Legacies aren't really a white issue. More an 'entitled twats who also happen to mostly be white' issue. That they flatten the diversity curve is the least of their sins.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:40AM

      by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:40AM (#35304)

      > Legacies aren't really a white issue. More an 'entitled twats who also happen to mostly be white' issue.
      > That they flatten the diversity curve is the least of their sins.

      Oh yeah, I forgot you are the guy who thinks that not only do we not have a problem with structural racism, but that it is impossible for structural racism to exist. An analysis slightly above the level of object permanence.

      • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:58AM

        by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:58AM (#35309) Homepage Journal
        More or less correct; institutional racism is just a term that gets flung around to get all the benefits of playing the race card yet avoid having to prove actual racism. But what I meant is legacies don't have the numbers to make much of a difference.
        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
        • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:21AM

          by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:21AM (#35340)

          > institutional racism is just a term that gets flung around to get all the benefits of playing the race card yet avoid having to prove actual racism.

          The proof is the simple and undisputed fact that actual representation is not anywhere near proportional to demographics.

          > But what I meant is legacies don't have the numbers to make much of a difference.

          So, not only does poof have to be simple enough for a 5-year old to recognize, it also must be large-scale in order to qualify.

          • (Score: 3, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @11:29AM

            by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @11:29AM (#35465) Homepage Journal

            The proof is the simple and undisputed fact that actual representation is not anywhere near proportional to demographics.

            Logic FAIL. Demographics are not and should not be used or you neglect actual qualification. Last I looked, minorities disproportionately lived in poor neighborhoods with shit schools and thus had less of an opportunity to become qualified. Not their fault. Not my fault. Not any university's fault. Just the truth.

            Is that a shit position to be in? Sure. Does it mean unqualified people should get admitted? Nope. Racism cannot be balanced out with more racism. More racism only increases the hate and prolongs the underlying problem.

            So, not only does poof have to be simple enough for a 5-year old to recognize, it also must be large-scale in order to qualify.

            Oh, come on. You had a halfway decent argument going with the first one. Don't fuck it up by trolling in the second half when you knew damned well what I meant.

            --
            My rights don't end where your fear begins.
            • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @12:03PM

              by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @12:03PM (#35477)

              > More racism only increases the hate and prolongs the underlying problem.

              AA is an acknowledgement that the current situation is shit and that wholesale change of the system can not happen until there is adequate representation among the people with the power to do something about it. You know what actually prolongs the underlying problem? Throwing up your hands and saying that it's "just the truth" and expecting the situation to sort itself out.

              > Oh, come on. You had a halfway decent argument going with the first one.
              > Don't fuck it up by trolling in the second half when you knew damned well what I meant.

              So, pointing out the logical conclusion of your argument is trolling? How convenient for you.

              • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:03PM

                by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:03PM (#35501) Homepage Journal

                AA is an acknowledgement that the current situation is shit and that wholesale change of the system can not happen until there is adequate representation among the people with the power to do something about it. You know what actually prolongs the underlying problem? Throwing up your hands and saying that it's "just the truth" and expecting the situation to sort itself out.

                Oh, I'll grant you it's good-hearted but it's counterproductive. It only increases racial hatred when someone gets a spot they don't deserve because of their skin color. Witness my very much non-racist ass being pissed off about it and consider how people of a less enlightened disposition are taking getting fucked out of admittance. There is not a damned pro-active thing that can be done to solve the issue, only reactive. By that I mean throwing anyone you have evidence of racial discrimination in a position of power from in federal butt-pounding prison.

                So, pointing out the logical conclusion of your argument is trolling? How convenient for you.

                Putting words in my mouth is. I've no issue with, and would even be in favor of, getting rid of the practice but I don't see it as much of a problem due to the fairly small effect it has; efforts are better spent where they will do more good more quickly. But you seem to want a flamewar today, as usual, rather than rational discussion.

                --
                My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:13PM

                  by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:13PM (#35506)

                  > It only increases racial hatred when someone gets a spot they don't deserve because of their skin color.

                  Wah, wah, wah. Loss of unearned privilege is sooo unfair! All those people who have to live lives of repression because they were born with the wrong skin color, its just better that they get to be the repository of all the hatred in the country. So much better that way.

                  Answer this - what is wrong with racism? Really, what is the problem with racism?

                  > Putting words in my mouth is.

                  Oh bullshit. Your rebuttal was juvenile and I spelled out exactly why it was juvenile. There was no words put in your mouth, only a description of why your argument was so weak.

                  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:20PM

                    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:20PM (#35512) Homepage Journal

                    Ooooh, you used the privilege buzzword. You lose.

                    And now since you want so badly to make a flamewar of this...

                    All the old paintings on the tombs,
                    They do the sand dance,
                    Don't you know?

                    --
                    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                    • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:39PM

                      by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @01:39PM (#35520)

                      > Ooooh, you used the privilege buzzword. You lose.

                      How convenient for you to pick unstated arbitrary lines that other people are not permitted to cross in a discussion.

                      Answer the question:

                      Why is racism bad?

                      Failure to answer will be yet another example of you running away because you've been argued into a corner of your own illogic.

                      • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @02:08PM

                        by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @02:08PM (#35540) Homepage Journal

                        I'll answer something else instead since you don't see why using the privilege buzzword was so absurd and argument-stopping.

                        Privilege comes from the Latin for "private law", meaning one set of rules for one group and one for another. This means you lose because that is exactly what anyone using it is advocating, special treatment under the law or rules for <popular group of the day>. You are saying one group who advocates against any private law is the beneficiary of private law that you cannot point to and thus you must institute private law against them to correct it.

                        Okay, it's a stupid question but I've an answer I'm rather fond of, so WTF. Most people can rarely go five minutes without taking an affirmative action towards being some flavor of asshole, which is quite sufficient and logical to hate them for. Hating them for something they had no say in like skin color shows that you're too much of a moron to realize this and are just spewing unearned hate indiscriminately.

                        --
                        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                        • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @02:33PM

                          by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @02:33PM (#35552)

                          > Privilege comes from the Latin for "private law",

                          So you are a dictionary pedant. Of course, like all such pedants, the only definition that counts is the one that is most convenient for you.

                          See the first (and therefore most common usage) in the oxford english dictionary: [oxforddictionaries.com]

                          A special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group.

                          Therefore the advantage of not growing up in a ghetto, not getting substandard education, of not being looked at as an outsider and all the other stuff that comes with being a member of the dominant social group is indeed privilege.

                          The problem with being a dictionary pedant is that when your entire argument is based on that kind of over-simplification, then it all falls apart once that definition shown to be incomplete.

                          Answer the question:

                          Why is racism bad?

                          Failure to answer will be yet another example of you running away because you've been argued into a corner of your own illogic.

                          • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @02:54PM

                            by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @02:54PM (#35571) Homepage Journal

                            Therefore the advantage of not growing up in a ghetto, not getting substandard education, of not being looked at as an outsider and all the other stuff that comes with being a member of the dominant social group is indeed privilege.

                            Nope, that's simple luck of the draw. Equal opportunity and equal rights means nobody gets to hold you down and that you can be assured equal treatment under the law, not that you get given a leg up if you happen to get born into a shitty situation. I got dealt an extremely shit hand by birth but you don't hear me bitching about it or asking for handouts I haven't earned.

                            I did give an answer, see above. It's not the answer because it's a big question with many answers, but it's one of the ones I'm most fond of.

                            --
                            My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                            • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:23PM

                              by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:23PM (#35602)

                              > Nope, that's simple luck of the draw.

                              Yeah, luck of the draw to be born into an oppressed social group. That's not racism at all, just random luck.

                              > I got dealt an extremely shit hand by birth

                              Yeah? So you were born into a group that society has singled out for oppression? I don't think so.

                              > you don't hear me bitching about it or asking for handouts I haven't earned.

                              That's the very definition of unearned privilege -- you don't have to ask for it, it just comes to you without you even noticing. Your position is like those people who say, "How come there isn't a white history month? Why do blacks get a whole month and whites don't get any?" When in practice every month in the USA is white history month.

                              > I did give an answer, see above.

                              Oh, I thought that was just random babble. You think racism is a bad thing for society because some people get mad when they don't get to fully enjoy the historical privilege of their social group? Great analysis, for a 5 year old.

                              The correct answer is that racism is bad because it causes unequal opportunity. That's it, all the other problems with racism like the ugliness of hatred are ants next to the behemoth of unequal opportunity. AA attempts to equalize opportunity, so that no racial group is privileged with more opportunity than any other with the end goal of racial egalitarianism eventually becoming self-sustaining.

                              You are all hung up on the specifics without paying attention to the end result. Classic forest and trees thinking.

                              • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:35PM

                                by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:35PM (#35607) Homepage Journal

                                Depressed not oppressed. Anyone still oppressing is breaking the law and can be dealt with.

                                Yes, though they mostly just exterminated us, and damned poor to boot.

                                You seem to think I'm white and have bunches of this magical privilege while I look down on the poor colored help and say get a job. You are mistaken.

                                You asked why it was bad, not bad for society. Be specific if you want a specific question answered. You seem to already be sure of an answer though, so I won't bother disabusing you of your holy writ.

                                --
                                My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                                • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:51PM

                                  by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @03:51PM (#35623)

                                  > Depressed not oppressed

                                  Really? You want to try that dictionary pedant shit again?

                                  > Anyone still oppressing is breaking the law and can be dealt with.

                                  That's more five year old thinking. If it isn't single-hop, point-A to point-B, then it isn't happening despite the end result being very clear.

                                  > Yes, though they mostly just exterminated us, and damned poor to boot.

                                  ooooh you have a secret and are so special because of it.

                                  > You seem to think I'm white

                                  I think you are not a member of a social group that is particularly oppressed in the USA and thus enjoy the privileges of not being any of those groups. But even if you are an uncle tom type that wouldn't make your argument any more true.

                                  > You asked why it was bad, not bad for society. Be specific

                                  Hah. Oh yeah, lets try to direct the discussion away from the point and that you can't dispute. Run away from facing your own illogic again. Tell you what, just leave the word "society" out of the answer, it is still just as true.

                                  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 24 2014, @04:03PM

                                    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 24 2014, @04:03PM (#35629) Homepage Journal

                                    Oh you did not just call me an Uncle Tom. We're done, you just lost your favorite playmate, racist boy.

                                    --
                                    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                                    • (Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 24 2014, @04:35PM

                                      by Angry Jesus (182) on Thursday April 24 2014, @04:35PM (#35644)

                                      > Oh you did not just call me an Uncle Tom. We're done, you just lost your favorite playmate, racist boy.

                                      Oooh, fauxrage FTL! You don't get to claim secret membership of an oppressed group as giving you authority on the topic and then argue that oppression doesn't exist without being called out for hypocrisy.

                                      What you are is running away from the arguments that you can't dispute. As is usual for you.

                                      Let's recap from the beginning:

                                      TPM> Jailing people for acts of racism is the way to correct racism in the USA.
                                      ME> Gives example of how college legacies legally perpetuate racial privilege
                                      TPM> That doesn't count because it doesn't directly effect enough people.

                                      TPM> Being born into a socially oppressed group is just "the luck of the draw" like being born to a poor family.
                                      ME> That would only be true if poverty were not so strongly correlated with oppressed groups.

                                      TPM> You can't use the word "privilege" because the dictionary says it only means "legal" privilege
                                      ME> OED says your definition is ridiculously incomplete, that "privilege" is the correct term.

                                      TPM> Racism is bad because people used to being on the winning side get all hateful when they don't get that benefit anymore.

                                      I don't think you are consciously racist, but hardly anyone ever is. I think you just choose to be willfully ignorant as to how modern racism works. Your "luck of the draw" comment really makes that clear. That is naked privilege talking or the shallow thinking of a five year old.