Maybe it's just me, but I've been getting this vibe (it's strong here, but I'm feeling it elsewhere too) that there are folks who would like to see our entire society come crashing down.
Perhaps they think we can build something better, and like the Phoenix, emerge from the ashes, strong and vibrant.
And I guess I can see the attraction. Our government has been co-opted by the monied interests, our waking lives seem to be either being tracked by corporations or one government agency or another, the same monied interests seem determined to depress wages to keep us docile and hungry for the resources we need to keep ourselves and our families alive. And on and on. It's as if our society has been taken over by greedy, corrupt and amoral scumbags.
And to an extent, all of this is true. Which begs the question: What can/should we do about it?
There is one thing most of us can agree upon: That those elected to administer our governmental systems aren't acting in the best interests of the greater populace. Rather, they seem to be taking their marching orders from those with the resources to command their attention, their wallets and their votes.
There's quite a bit of agreement about that. The problem is that there are large groups of people on various sides of this question with different prescriptions for solving these problems:
Some think we need to strip the Federal government of most of its power and leave things to the states/counties/municipalities.
Some think we need to reform our existing political systems to reduce the influence of money on our elected officials (at all levels of government).
Some think it's just a lost cause and we need to just tear it all down and start over.
The biggest issue, IMHO, is that those same folks who are controlling our political systems for their own benefit use these differences of opinion to divide us. This keeps us from putting aside our differences so we can work together to create the kind of society of which we can all be proud.
Which brings me to the folks who want to tear our system down. With what shall we replace it?
Destroying one of the bulwarks of our society seems like we're creating change. But what are the consequences of doing so, intended or otherwise?
History (cf. all the infighting and problems with the Articles of Confederation) tells us that a strong central government was necessary back in the late 18th century, and (again, IMHO) is even more important today.
Could government be more distributed than it is? Possibly. Should there be stronger controls on how the central government treats its citizens? Almost certainly.
But if we destroy the "beast in DC" to punish those who have so egregiously abused it, who will pay the price when chaos ensues.
Just some semi-random thoughts.
(Score: 2) by shortscreen on Saturday July 16 2016, @05:09AM
The Articles of Confederation provided the feds with barely any power whatsoever. The Constitution provided somewhat more. The latter was "strong" compared to the former, but still hardly a drop in the bucket compared to what we have today.
We have all kinds of problems, and some of them are quite complicated. But this seems like one of the easier ones. If you don't like what a state government is doing, you have the option of staying the hell away from that state. Almost everybody has two legs and two feet and therefore the ability to move from state to state (having the will to do it is a separate problem). However, if you don't like what the feds are doing (btw, what was Congress's approval rating again?) then your options are a bit more limited. In fact, they are known to argue that you still owe them taxes even if you do manage to move out of the country.
In addition to that, history suggests that there are limits to what (as far as people, lands, and resources) can be effectively governed. Laws are added to the pile. Budgets grow. Bureaucracies bloat. Empires collapse.