Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday July 16 2016, @05:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the dept-line-redacted dept.

The long-secret 28-29 pages of the 9/11 Commission's report have been released by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee, albeit in a redacted form:

"According to various FBI documents and CIA memorandum, some of the September 11 hijackers, while in the United States, apparently had contacts with individuals who may be connected to the Saudi Government," the report said, giving a catalog of alleged links.

They included reported contacts between Saudis in California and a statement that a man who was reportedly a Saudi Interior Ministry official stayed at the same Virginia hotel as one hijacker in September 2001.

Another section said that Omar al-Bayoumi, said to be a Saudi intelligence officer, met with two hijackers at a public place after they arrived in San Diego. It said, citing FBI files, that his salary rose to $3,700 a month from $465 two months after two of the hijackers arrived in California.

One page described how two of the hijackers asked flight attendants technical questions during a trip in 1999 from Phoenix to Washington to attend a party at the Saudi embassy. One tried twice to enter the cockpit. The plane made an emergency landing and the FBI investigated, but did not prosecute.

Here are the documents, available at Cryptome or House.gov. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence says that the release of the documents is not an indication that the intelligence community agrees with their accuracy. Apparently, many of the leads mentioned have been investigated by the FBI and found to have no basis in fact.

So, SoylentNews readers, did the Saudis do 9/11?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Type44Q on Saturday July 16 2016, @08:45AM

    by Type44Q (4347) on Saturday July 16 2016, @08:45AM (#375299)

    MoonLandingWasFakedOnTheMoon

    Hey, now; that one's my theory!

  • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Saturday July 16 2016, @04:33PM

    by JNCF (4317) on Saturday July 16 2016, @04:33PM (#375381) Journal

    MoonLandingWasFakedOnTheMoon

    Hey, now; that one's my theory!

    I think this guy [thepromiserevealed.com] beat you both:

    I also feel some of these moon photos were genuine as it is well known that the original moon landing on the moon was not our first in fact we landed on Mars in 1962. The publicity stunt to land on the moon was to dupe the public in supporting the space program. We did land there but they switched over to a fake pre-produced video for part of the moon landing footage seen by the world in 1969.

    This was just the first google result, but this is a pretty common line of reasoning among people who believe that the US government has had flying saucer technology capable of interstellar travel since the 40s. And accepting that shaky premise, faking the moon landing on the moon might make a certain kind of sense -- they wouldn't even have to involve Stanley Kubrick!