Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday July 20 2016, @05:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the i-just-don't-get-it dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

This week Samuel Arbesman, a complexity scientist and writer, will publish "Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension." It's a well-developed guide for dealing with technologies that elude our full understanding. In his book, Arbesman writes we're entering the entanglement age, a phrase coined by Danny Hillis, "in which we are building systems that can't be grasped in their totality or held in the mind of a single person." In the case of driverless cars, machine learning systems build their own algorithms to teach themselves — and in the process become too complex to reverse engineer.

And it's not just software that's become unknowable to individual experts, says Arbesman.

Machines like particle accelerators and Boeing airplanes have millions of individual parts and miles of internal wiring. Even a technology like the U.S. Constitution, which began as an elegantly simple operating system, has grown to include a collection of federal laws "22 million words long with 80,000 connections between one section and another."

In the face of increasing complexity, experts are ever more likely to be taken by surprise when systems behave in unpredictable and unexpected ways.

Source: http://singularityhub.com/2016/07/17/the-world-will-soon-depend-on-technology-no-one-understands/

For a collection of over three decades of these (among other things) see The Risks Digest - Forum On Risks To The Public In Computers And Related Systems. It's not so much that this is a new problem, as it is an increasingly common one as technology becomes ever more complicated.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JNCF on Wednesday July 20 2016, @07:40PM

    by JNCF (4317) on Wednesday July 20 2016, @07:40PM (#377477) Journal

    Of course, a float will get caught on the chain more often than a filler valve will. For some tanks this only happens with an improperly adjusted (or plastic) chain, but others position the handle and the flapper so that the float can't be angled out of the way while keeping the chain short enough to do its job and the metal rod holding the float long enough to fill the tank properly. For such a poorly designed tank, the unobtrusive filler valve is a god send.

    Even for tanks where this isn't an issue I buy the most pervasive brand of filler valves now (Fluid MasterTM) because I appreciate being able to replace the top half of them without disconnecting the bottom half, and I know I can get a new one anywhere. Hugging toilets is not fun, and neither is draining that last less-than-half-inch of water out of tank. The water is more-or-less clean, but the area around it that gets redampened by any water that runs down the bottom of the tank to outside of the bowl isn't.

    But enough about toilets, the topic is bullshit!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3