Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Saturday July 23 2016, @04:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the 'resigns' != 're-signs' dept.

According to the Hollywood Reporter, Roger Ailes is to resign as chairman and CEO of Fox News. Rupert Murdoch is to take over Ailes' responsibilities. The resignation comes after accusations of sexual harassment. It is rumoured that he will receive $40 million as he leaves, but that he will be subject to a non-compete agreement.

Ailes had been with Fox News since its founding in 1996. Prior to that, he was a Republican political consultant.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Gravis on Saturday July 23 2016, @07:23PM

    by Gravis (4596) on Saturday July 23 2016, @07:23PM (#379133)

    And nothing of value was lost.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday July 23 2016, @07:38PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday July 23 2016, @07:38PM (#379140) Journal

    I kind of agree - but - did you see the bit where Rupert Murdoch will be taking over? So, uhhhh, they get rid of a pig, and put the Head Boar in charge? Nothing that Murdoch touches can be called "clean", but if he's going to be wallowing in the filth, I guaratee things are going to get worse.

    Alright, so maybe he doesn't lech the employees, like Ailes. There are thousands of ways he can make Fox worse than it already is.

    --
    I'm going to buy my defensive radar from Temu, just like Venezuela!
    • (Score: 1, Redundant) by aristarchus on Saturday July 23 2016, @08:14PM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Saturday July 23 2016, @08:14PM (#379151) Journal

      There are thousands of ways he can make Fox worse than it already is.

      Unpossible! Tell us more! How could this possibly happen?

      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday July 23 2016, @08:37PM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday July 23 2016, @08:37PM (#379159) Journal

        Murdoch embodies all of the most evil bits of conservatism that liberals fear and hate. He doesn't just dabble at evil, like your typical neoconservative. Murdock epitomizes everything that is wrong with the conservative party.

        --
        I'm going to buy my defensive radar from Temu, just like Venezuela!
        • (Score: 2, Funny) by aristarchus on Saturday July 23 2016, @11:16PM

          by aristarchus (2645) on Saturday July 23 2016, @11:16PM (#379210) Journal

          This does not answer my question. How could Murdock make it worse? It already is Fox News.

          • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 24 2016, @06:25AM

            by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 24 2016, @06:25AM (#379314) Journal

            You are many things, but I didn't think you were especially obtuse.

            As bad as Fox is now, they at least pretend to be "fair and balanced". What happens if they just drop the pretense? People complain about unfair coverage now - when they go on vicious attacks on anyone and everyone who doesn't toe the party line, or whatever Murdoch thinks the party line should be, that will be a tremendous change.

            Refresh your memory of the McCarthy days. Murdoch is capable of all of that, and more. And, worst of all, he has so damned much money, he can get away with almost ANYTHING.

            It took an investigation into a little girl's murder in the UK to stop Murdoch from paying hackers to break into celebrity and political figure's emails and social accounts. Sure, they put their own spin on the whole issue, making it look like junior execs were responsible for all of that. BUT - those celebrities who fought, and were eventually paid off to drop charges were paid out of Murdoch's personal funds. That is, Murdoch took money out of his own pocket, not corporate coffers, to pay off the pissed off celebrities.

            Then, after at least a half dozen payoffs, he has the audacity to pretend that he knew nothing of the hacking.

            As things stand right now, there is a little bit of insulation between the evil emperor, and his puppet news outlet. That insulation does serve his own purposes, but it also protects Fox and the American publc from his direct meddling.

            --
            I'm going to buy my defensive radar from Temu, just like Venezuela!
            • (Score: 3, Interesting) by aristarchus on Sunday July 24 2016, @07:43AM

              by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday July 24 2016, @07:43AM (#379323) Journal

              Runaway, Runaway! Did you ever get the feeling you were just out of your league here on the internets? Do you find that people misunderstand your points, and respond with points that make no sense to you? Then you might be a (tm Jeff Foxworthy) redneck. This is not meant as an insult, redneck lives matter, and some of my best friends are rednecks. However, I do not go to them for the finer points of political propaganda.

              You are many things, but I didn't think you were especially obtuse.

              See above. As Walt Whitman said: "Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."

              As bad as Fox is now, they at least pretend to be "fair and balanced". What happens if they just drop the pretense?

              If they stop pretending? As in, a court case for lying resulting in the Fox News organization admitting that they lie? As a matter of policy? Fairy Unbalances, and that is just the Milo/gay side of the deep closeted Republican operatives. The "dirty old man" contingent, the "Fair and Look at those gams!" side, had some more cred with the Evangelicals, the "social conservatives", the "squirrel-eating Huckabee" contingent (actually squirrel is not bad, compared to prairie jack rabbit), but they are losing even that now that the men's rights crew are all whining entitled non-conservatives and gamergaters instead of "true" conservatives.

              No, the point is that there is nothing Fox News can do that is worse. Anything that they do will remove the pretense of journalism, something that has been rather transparent to most for a rather long time. And then they will be less influential, less dangerous, more like the Washington Times and Breitbart, in other words, they will become toothless right-wing nut-job websites, just on cable.

              The loss of legitimacy is the one thing that can kill an alleged news organization. Fox is there. Fox is dead. No one believes anything that Fox says anymore. Trump thinks they are liars. And everyone knows Trump is a liar. So when you are nothing but a liar to liars, well, game over?

              • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 24 2016, @11:22AM

                by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 24 2016, @11:22AM (#379362) Journal

                You should study a little about propaganda. I assure you, Fox can get much worse than it is. Your attempts at mockery don't change the fact that things CAN get worse.

                I wonder - do you have a stunted imagination?

                --
                I'm going to buy my defensive radar from Temu, just like Venezuela!
    • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Saturday July 23 2016, @08:33PM

      by butthurt (6141) on Saturday July 23 2016, @08:33PM (#379157) Journal

      The article says that Murdoch will serve "until a permanent CEO is named."