Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday July 23 2016, @10:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the 'hit-the-road'-but-don't-take-it-literally dept.

ScienceNews reports on a report from the CDC (informative graph):

U.S. drivers love to hit the road. The problem is doing so safely.

In 2013, 32,894 people in the United States died in motor vehicle crashes. Although down since 2000, the overall death rate - 10.3 per 100,000 people - tops 19 other high-income countries, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported July 8. Belgium is a distant second with 6.5 deaths per 100,000. Researchers reviewed World Health Organization and other data on vehicle crash deaths, seat belt use and alcohol-impaired driving in 2000 and 2013.

Canada had the highest percentage of fatal crashes caused by drunk drivers: 33.6 percent. New Zealand and the United States tied for second at 31 percent. But Canada and 16 other countries outperformed the United States on seat belt use - even though, in 2013, 87 percent of people in the United States reported wearing safety belts while riding in the front seat.

Spain saw the biggest drop - 75 percent - in its crash death rate. That country improved nearly all aspects of road safety, including decreasing alcohol-impaired driving and increasing seat belt use, the researchers say.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by choose another one on Monday July 25 2016, @09:36AM

    by choose another one (515) on Monday July 25 2016, @09:36AM (#379719)

    The _real_ reference behind TFA actually _does_ use deaths per distance traveled, if you look at the right column:

    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6526e1.htm#T1_down [cdc.gov]

    What is most interesting to me is not the absolute numbers, since there are some purely situational / geographical factors that could account for that, it is that the US has shown least improvement (by a long way) over the 13 or so years compared. The US is doing something very different, question is what. It _may_ be bad driving, but it might be other things - the US has a completely different car market and car safety standards to everywhere else (except maybe Canada) for one thing, maybe the US penchant for bigger (well, f***king enormous) cars compared to elsewhere is actually reducing safety.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Thursday July 28 2016, @04:09AM

    by frojack (1554) on Thursday July 28 2016, @04:09AM (#381043) Journal

    US safety standards drive the standards for rest of the world. And larger is safer in almost every case.

    So it isn't the equipment.
    It might be the price of fuel.

    But just look at those Vehicle miles traveled (billions) column in the link you posted. No country comes close. Look at Registered vehicles. No country comes close.

    So sheer Traffic Density is my guess.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.