SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
SoylentNews
The California Senate on Thursday voted down a state measure that would require smarter anti-theft security on smartphones. The bill, introduced by State Senator Mark Leno and sponsored by George Gascon, San Francisco's district attorney, would have required a so-called kill switch which would render a smartphone useless after it was stolen on all smartphones sold in California. The proposal needed 21 votes to pass in the 40-member chamber. After debate on Thursday morning at the Capitol, in Sacramento, it fell two votes short of passing, with a final count of 19 to 17 in favor.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
California Rejects Phone "Kill Switch" Law
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 39 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
You will be attacked by a beast who has the body of a wolf, the tail of
a lion, and the face of Donald Duck.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Tuesday April 29 2014, @08:29PM
"So in other words, we're talking about implementing the same thing they've already implemented just with an extra middle-man this time?
Nope.
"It's gonna take a minimum of a day for me to get it blocked through the carrier; but it only takes a few seconds for me to get it blocked myself. So what possible value could this add?"
The phone would become a brick and have no resale value.. hence the need for ALL the carriers to get involved.
🏳️🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️🌈