SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
New data shows that the majority of robot-enabled scam phone calls came from fewer than 40 call centers, a finding that offers hope the growing menace of robocalls can be stopped.
The calls use computers and the Internet to dial thousands of phone numbers every minute and promote fraudulent schemes that promise to lower credit card interest rates, offer loans, and sell home security products, to name just a few of the scams. Over the past decade, robocall complaints have mushroomed, with the Federal Trade Commission often receiving hundreds of thousands of complaints each month. In 2013, the consumer watchdog agency awarded $50,000 to three groups who devised blocking systems that had the potential to help end the scourge. Three years later, however, the robocall problem seems as intractable as ever.
On Thursday at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas, a researcher said that slightly more than half of more than 1 million robocalls tracked were sent by just 38 telephony infrastructures. The relatively small number of actors offers hope that the phenomenon can be rooted out, by either automatically blocking the call centers or finding ways for law enforcement groups to identify and prosecute the operators.
"We know that the majority of robocalls only come from 38 different infrastructures," Aude Marzuoli, research scientist at a company called Pindrop Labs, told Ars. "It's not as if there are thousands of people out there doing this. If you can catch this small number of bad actors we can" stop the problem."
Pindrop researchers reached the conclusion by creating a security honeypot of phone numbers that received more than 1 million robocalls. The researchers transcribed about 10 percent of the calls and analyzed the semantics with machine-learning techniques to isolate identical scams. The researchers combined those results with analysis that tracked 150 different audio features of each call. By studying the codecs, packet loss, spectrum, and frequency inside the audio and combining the results with the machine learning, the researchers were able to obtain a fingerprint of each different call center.
(Score: 1) by daver!west!fmc on Monday August 08 2016, @05:41AM
Way back in the 1990s it was possible to run a CLEC (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier) whose business was modem pools configured to answer inbound calls. The way this worked was that there were settlement fees paid by the originating LEC to the terminating LEC, one when the call was answered and a per-time-unit charge for the length of the call. As calls to ISPs tended to go on for a while, and always went to the ISP, the business model was to sign up ISPs as customers and then collect money from both ISP customers and from originating LECs (usually the incumbent telco(s) from which the ISP's customers had wireline telephone service).
I'm not sure what happened to this, whether the settlement fees were done away with once the ILECs complained about not having done this themselves or whether the decline of dialup Internet access made it not worth doing.
If the settlement fees are still in place, there's your motivation for why the phone companies don't see robocalls as a problem: every time one of those calls is answered, there is money in it for them.