Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Tuesday August 09 2016, @08:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-many-wrongs-does-it-take-to-make-a-right dept.

Common Dreams reports

In a much-hailed, if modestly problematic, act of righteous revenge, [on Thursday August 4,] an African-American inmate allegedly sucker-punched [...] Dylann Roof--an act that sparked much online praise for the "vigilante hero", a fundraiser for donations to his commissary account, and, finally, the posting of his $100,000 bond by a supporter.

Roof is in protective custody at the Charleston County Detention Center for killing nine African-American churchgoers in South Carolina in 2015. He was in the shower when Dwayne Stafford, a 26-year-old inmate reportedly doing time for either weed violations or strong arm burglary, allegedly got out of his cell, reached Roof, and landed a couple of punches to his face. The sheriff said Roof was attacked "for no reason", which many would argue was less than accurate.

Roof suffered only minor injuries, and his lawyer declined to press charges.

[...] The next day, 18 months after he'd originally been arrested, an anonymous supporter posted [Stafford's] bond, and on Friday he was reportedly freed.

I find that heavy.com typically has the facts quickly on violent crimes.

Previous: [Racially-Motivated Mass Murder in] Charleston, SC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday August 09 2016, @09:08PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday August 09 2016, @09:08PM (#385965) Journal

    Our lax attitude towards prisoner's rights in this county is truly disgusting.

    I don't care how evil the person is; let's stick with the constitution's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

    The fact that "pound-me-in-the-ass prison" is so widely accepted as OK that it's considered funny is a sad joke on all of us.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=4, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by GungnirSniper on Tuesday August 09 2016, @09:37PM

    by GungnirSniper (1671) on Tuesday August 09 2016, @09:37PM (#385982) Journal

    And that we consider death-by-time to be somehow superior to death-by-execution. Being caged for decades is crueler, for at least execution has a sooner end.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 09 2016, @10:30PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 09 2016, @10:30PM (#385998)

      I think it's not necessary to worry about whether life imprisonment is more or less cruel than a death sentence.

      With a life sentence, if the convict would rather be dead than live in prison, they can just kill themselves. Doesn't seem like people are having too much trouble with this currently.

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Kell on Tuesday August 09 2016, @10:40PM

      by Kell (292) on Tuesday August 09 2016, @10:40PM (#386003)

      That's debatable: many prisoners who are incarcerated, never to be released, nevertheless establish meaningful lives in prison. The life of the mind can be fulfilling, even when isolated from society. Prisons do not have to be hellish places of torment, even though it seems to be an emergent phenomenon of society.

      Furthermore, a wrongly-convicted prisoner who is executed can never have his sentence overturned - it is final. In contrast, a person who is vindicated can have their time spent in prison duly compensated for. Until such time as we can perfectly prove beyond all doubt that a prisoner is guilty, execution should be an unacceptable outcome.

      --
      Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
      • (Score: 2) by wisnoskij on Wednesday August 10 2016, @01:19AM

        by wisnoskij (5149) <{jonathonwisnoski} {at} {gmail.com}> on Wednesday August 10 2016, @01:19AM (#386055)

        In contrast, a person who is vindicated can have their time spent in prison duly compensated for.

        No, they cannot. Find me a single ex-prisoner who believes that they were duly compensated for all that resulted from their incorrect verdict. Out of the thousands and thousands, you will never be able to find one, I guarantee you that.

        • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @01:37AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @01:37AM (#386065)

          Well since we can't create/reverse time so there is no way to properly compensate these people. I was going to ask for more details and then thought a quick search might help... http://www.innocenceproject.org/compensating-wrongly-convicted/ [innocenceproject.org]

          Seems like quite a few states don't even compensate, and those that do don't do a very good job. I think a mid to high tier salary covering the same number of years would be a good start, let the wronged people have financial support to get on their feet and recover from their time. With a minimum of 1 year.

        • (Score: 2) by Kell on Wednesday August 10 2016, @11:53AM

          by Kell (292) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @11:53AM (#386223)

          It's hypothetical that amends could be made - eg. be wrongly convicted for 10, but spend the rest of your life in multimillionaire retirement, that kind of thing. Of course, the same social impulse that makes prisons hell-holes is the same impulse that prevents the wrongfully-convicted of being properly compensated. It's not perfect or likely, but at least it could happen, as opposed to with a prisoner who has been executed.

          --
          Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @06:08AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @06:08AM (#386141)

        The primary problem with state-sanctioned executions is that the state does not own your life, therefore they do not have the right to take it. Self-sovereignty means you're free to end your own life whenever you choose, but no matter how heinous your crimes, your life remains yours, it is a violation of fundamental human rights for the state to claim ownership of any person's life for any reason. This is why executions will never be anything but an extreme violation of human rights.

        • (Score: 2) by Kell on Wednesday August 10 2016, @11:51AM

          by Kell (292) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @11:51AM (#386222)

          Then should we never allow our police forces to fire upon an active-shooter who is murdering civilians? Clearly there are some scenarios where the government is not just mandated to take life, but obligated to. The special sovereignty of human life is not absolute and never has been.

          --
          Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @04:36PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @04:36PM (#386314)

            Then should we never allow our police forces to fire upon an active-shooter who is murdering civilians?

            No, we shouldn't. The job of police is to catch criminals so they can be brought before the courts to find out if they're guilty or not. Their job is not to act as judge, jury, and executioner no matter the circumstance. The people being shot at do have the right to self defense, up to and including using deadly force if necessary, but deadly force should never be an option for police, because thats whats known as summary execution [wikipedia.org].

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @07:52PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @07:52PM (#386361)

        many prisoners who are incarcerated, never to be released, nevertheless establish meaningful lives in prison. The life of the mind can be fulfilling, even when isolated from society.

        So, it's kind of like your mom's basement ;-)

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 09 2016, @10:51PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 09 2016, @10:51PM (#386010)

      But at least "being caged for decades" is, in many/most ways, reversible. Find out that prisoner is actually innocent, you can't unexecute them but you can let them free and rehabilitate them. Additionally, you can make imprisonment conditions better in many ways but not so much with execution.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Wednesday August 10 2016, @02:23AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday August 10 2016, @02:23AM (#386074) Journal

    It's a problem of oversight. The jailers and wardens know how to make life difficult for their prisoners, and play little games with them and exploit loopholes. That's on top of the guards that may be paid off to look the other way when something like this happens.

    https://freebarrettbrown.org/writings/ [freebarrettbrown.org]

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by Entropy on Wednesday August 10 2016, @02:54AM

    by Entropy (4228) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @02:54AM (#386085)

    It's OK. Because the victim is white, and the aggressor is black. Black people can't be racist, only white people. And if they attack a white racist(of which all whites are racist) then it's because they were enslaved 150 years ago which is really the white racist's fault.

    • (Score: 4, Touché) by jmorris on Wednesday August 10 2016, @05:14AM

      by jmorris (4844) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @05:14AM (#386130)

      Dude. You are talking about an asshole who went into a church, sat through a bible study and then committed mass murder. And the asshole says he did it because they were black. If that isn't racism I really don't want to hear your definition. If some black dude then punches him in the face in prison I really can't muster a fuck to give ya. Asshole bought that whuppin' fair and square.

      Come back later when BLM has done something stupid/evil/racist, again, and we can discuss the politically correct bullshit you are on about. Mass murder is in a slightly different category than precious snowflakes being triggered.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @06:16AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @06:16AM (#386143)

        Wow, never thought I'd mod up jmorris, especially not for saying that a racist piece of shit had it coming and deserved it.

        And for the record, the idea that "Only whites can be racist" is super fucking racist. Anybody and everybody can be racist, but at the moment whites are the only ones passing laws to oppress non-whites.

        • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday August 10 2016, @07:43AM

          by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @07:43AM (#386162) Journal

          I modded him up too. Credit where credit is due; even Hitler wasn't 100% wrong about everything, else he'd have choked on his cereal at age 3. J-Mo is like a stuck clock; once in a while, he'll get it right, if even only for a second at a time. He kind of shat all over it with the latter half of his post of course, but then, he wouldn't be J-Mo if he didn't :/

          --
          I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...