Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday August 12 2016, @01:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the legalize-it dept.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) has once again rejected attempts to reschedule cannabis and allow medical cannabis federally:

The Obama administration has denied a bid by two Democratic governors to reconsider how it treats marijuana under federal drug control laws, keeping the drug for now, at least, in the most restrictive category for U.S. law enforcement purposes. Drug Enforcement Administration chief Chuck Rosenberg says the decision is rooted in science. Rosenberg gave "enormous weight" to conclusions by the Food and Drug Administration that marijuana has "no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States," and by some measures, it remains highly vulnerable to abuse as the most commonly used illicit drug across the nation.

"This decision isn't based on danger. This decision is based on whether marijuana, as determined by the FDA, is a safe and effective medicine," he said, "and it's not." Marijuana is considered a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, alongside heroin and LSD, while other, highly addictive substances including oxycodone and methamphetamine are regulated differently under Schedule II of the law. But marijuana's designation has nothing to do with danger, Rosenberg said.

The Post article notes:

In the words of a 2015 Brookings Institution report, a move to Schedule II "would signal to the medical community that [the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health] are ready to take medical marijuana research seriously, and help overcome a government-sponsored chilling effect on research that manifests in direct and indirect ways."

However, the DEA will expand the number of locations federally licensed to grow cannabis for research from the current total of... 1: the University of Mississippi.

Related: Compassionate Investigational New Drug program


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by driven on Friday August 12 2016, @04:24PM

    by driven (6295) on Friday August 12 2016, @04:24PM (#387075)

    Sounds like a straw man anyway. Why does marijuana need to be a safe and effective _medicine_ to be legal? Is alcohol a safe and effective medicine? No, and it can be misused just like pot.
    Enough with the false fronts.. let's hear the real reasons it is still not legal. The truth may or may not be pretty, but you can't have a proper dialog without facts. Presenting lies as your reasoning is counterproductive and undermines your own authority. (I'm speaking of the Obama administration quoted in the summary)

    I have my own opinions on marijuana use as I've known several people who smoke it and while I personally suspect it could have some long term effects (again, so can alcohol), I would never call it "dangerous". It's a fact that it does relax people, and I know and have heard of exactly zero people who have died of it.

    Maybe we'd have fewer radicals if people had something legal and easily accessible that they could "unplug" from reality for awhile with.

    Just my 2 cents..

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2