Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday August 12 2016, @01:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the legalize-it dept.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) has once again rejected attempts to reschedule cannabis and allow medical cannabis federally:

The Obama administration has denied a bid by two Democratic governors to reconsider how it treats marijuana under federal drug control laws, keeping the drug for now, at least, in the most restrictive category for U.S. law enforcement purposes. Drug Enforcement Administration chief Chuck Rosenberg says the decision is rooted in science. Rosenberg gave "enormous weight" to conclusions by the Food and Drug Administration that marijuana has "no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States," and by some measures, it remains highly vulnerable to abuse as the most commonly used illicit drug across the nation.

"This decision isn't based on danger. This decision is based on whether marijuana, as determined by the FDA, is a safe and effective medicine," he said, "and it's not." Marijuana is considered a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, alongside heroin and LSD, while other, highly addictive substances including oxycodone and methamphetamine are regulated differently under Schedule II of the law. But marijuana's designation has nothing to do with danger, Rosenberg said.

The Post article notes:

In the words of a 2015 Brookings Institution report, a move to Schedule II "would signal to the medical community that [the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health] are ready to take medical marijuana research seriously, and help overcome a government-sponsored chilling effect on research that manifests in direct and indirect ways."

However, the DEA will expand the number of locations federally licensed to grow cannabis for research from the current total of... 1: the University of Mississippi.

Related: Compassionate Investigational New Drug program


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by rts008 on Friday August 12 2016, @06:06PM

    by rts008 (3001) on Friday August 12 2016, @06:06PM (#387106)

    In context of this discussion, so what? What exactly does that opinion have to do with the DEA's decision, or drug laws and policy about marijuana?

    Why you were modded insightful instead of offtopic, troll, or flamebait, is troubling, and an abuse of modpoints, IMO.(and according to the SN moderator's guidelines)

    Go beat your dead horses somewhere else.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Monday August 15 2016, @02:41PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Monday August 15 2016, @02:41PM (#388193)

    It's entirely relevant, you obvious Hillary shill, because Hillary is most likely to become the next President, so we can expect more of this after her coronation.

    • (Score: 2) by rts008 on Monday August 15 2016, @03:49PM

      by rts008 (3001) on Monday August 15 2016, @03:49PM (#388218)

      LOL! The joke is on you, as I am NOT a Hillary shill. I voted for Bernie.

      I do not like Hillary at all, but I will vote for her to try to prevent Trump from getting in the White House.