Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Sunday April 27 2014, @11:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the month-late-reporting-on-13th-century-thought dept.

Ideas in a thirteenth-century treatise on the nature of matter still resonate today, say Tom C. B. McLeish and colleagues.

A paper called "De Luce" (On Light), written in 1225 in Latin and dense with mathematical thinking, explores the nature of matter and the cosmos. Four centuries before Isaac Newton proposed gravity and seven centuries before the Big Bang theory. To our knowledge, De Luce is the first attempt to describe the heavens and Earth using a single set of physical laws. Implying, probably unrealized by its author, a family of ordered universes in an ocean of disordered ones, the physics resembles the modern 'multiverse' concept.

This may be of special interest to those learning of the history of the universe on "Cosmos", which covers other famous historical thinkers.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Monday April 28 2014, @02:49AM

    by Nerdfest (80) on Monday April 28 2014, @02:49AM (#37005)

    You're correct. Putting together a perfect summary is difficult though, and I think I did this fairly late at night. He was apparently a brilliant man. It seems he went extremely far with very little existing knowledge to base his theories on. Up until some recent modern ideas though, he was probably thought to be nuts, otherwise we'd probably have heard of him before.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday April 28 2014, @04:06AM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Monday April 28 2014, @04:06AM (#37024) Journal

    Yes, one does not just simply walk into a Medieval Multiverse Theory! Especially if you have to really stretch the illumination to make it fit. But no matter. Grosseteste, or in modern terms, Gross Testes. No wonder people may have thought he was nuts. English, you know.

    • (Score: 2) by starcraftsicko on Monday April 28 2014, @04:42AM

      by starcraftsicko (2821) on Monday April 28 2014, @04:42AM (#37028) Journal

      Grosseteste, or in modern terms, Gross Testes.

      I believe the correct translation is 'Giant Balls', though I am worried that the plural may not be quite right.

      --
      This post was created with recycled electrons.
      • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday April 28 2014, @08:21AM

        by aristarchus (2645) on Monday April 28 2014, @08:21AM (#37064) Journal

        Perhaps you are right, the singular would be "teste"? Or maybe not, these things tend to make me "testy", or prone to irrational irritation about speculative theories that I put forth in the second century, or thereabouts.

      • (Score: 1) by EvilJim on Wednesday May 14 2014, @03:39AM

        by EvilJim (2501) on Wednesday May 14 2014, @03:39AM (#43050) Journal

        a gross is 12 dozen, that would be 144 balls. not bad...

  • (Score: 2) by black6host on Monday April 28 2014, @08:06AM

    by black6host (3827) on Monday April 28 2014, @08:06AM (#37059) Journal

    Indeed, a good summary is/can be a bit of work. Certainly wasn't meant as a personal attack. And thanks for the submission. I learned another interesting thing today.

    Actually I wrote a journal entry on this very subject (the difficulty of writing good submissions.)