Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Monday August 29 2016, @01:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the it-takes-all-kinds dept.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/opinion/sunday/a-confession-of-liberal-intolerance.html?_r=0

WE progressives believe in diversity, and we want women, blacks, Latinos, gays and Muslims at the table — er, so long as they aren't conservatives. Universities are the bedrock of progressive values, but the one kind of diversity that universities disregard is ideological and religious. We're fine with people who don't look like us, as long as they think like us.

O.K., that's a little harsh. But consider George Yancey, a sociologist who is black and evangelical. "Outside of academia I faced more problems as a black," he told me. "But inside academia I face more problems as a Christian, and it is not even close."

I've been thinking about this because on Facebook recently I wondered aloud whether universities stigmatize conservatives and undermine intellectual diversity. The scornful reaction from my fellow liberals proved the point.

"Much of the 'conservative' worldview consists of ideas that are known empirically to be false," said Carmi. "The truth has a liberal slant," wrote Michelle. "Why stop there?" asked Steven. "How about we make faculties more diverse by hiring idiots?"

To me, the conversation illuminated primarily liberal arrogance — the implication that conservatives don't have anything significant to add to the discussion. My Facebook followers have incredible compassion for war victims in South Sudan, for kids who have been trafficked, even for abused chickens, but no obvious empathy for conservative scholars facing discrimination.

The stakes involve not just fairness to conservatives or evangelical Christians, not just whether progressives will be true to their own values, not just the benefits that come from diversity (and diversity of thought is arguably among the most important kinds), but also the quality of education itself. When perspectives are unrepresented in discussions, when some kinds of thinkers aren't at the table, classrooms become echo chambers rather than sounding boards — and we all lose.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Username on Monday August 29 2016, @10:05AM

    by Username (4557) on Monday August 29 2016, @10:05AM (#394573)

    Conservative views are not equally well-reasoned and equally well-grounded in reality.

    Ok, I’ll bite. How is managing natural resources so the vast majority of fauna and flora do not die out unreal and unreasonable? Conservatism is a conservative view point.

    bronze age book and all the superstitions that come from it

    How is not killing, raping, or steal from your neighbors a bad thing? Almost all current laws are based on the 10 commandments.

    acknowledge that there's plenty of evidence backing things like climate change

    There is plenty of evidence of climate change in the bible. It’s just most people already understand that the climate has always changed and do not need to dramatize it. Funny how global warming became climate change when they realized the temperature has yet to go out of range of previous interglacial periods.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 29 2016, @11:13AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 29 2016, @11:13AM (#394595)

    How is managing natural resources so the vast majority of fauna and flora do not die out unreal and unreasonable? Conservatism is a conservative view point.

    If only conservatives believed in this.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 29 2016, @02:12PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 29 2016, @02:12PM (#394687)

      When a word loses its definition, it becomes useless for constructive purposes.

      "Conservative" and "liberal" are useless words today. Please use other words whose meanings have not yet been eviscerated.

      I prefer "individualist" (individual equal to all other individuals and each is greater than society) and "collectivist" (society's "needs" trump those of individuals) for now; hopefully their meanings will remain intact for a while longer.