Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday September 02 2016, @11:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-what-we-need dept.

South Carolina County Sprays for Zika, Kills Honey Bees

As Found here:

Following cases of Zika in the area, the county dispersed insecticides through aerial spraying using aircraft. They did not notify local populations, leading to the mass death of area bee keepers' entire population of honeybees.

This seems especially bad, given the context of continuing decline in bee populations:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_collapse_disorder

Common Dreams reports

Millions of honeybees are dead in Dorchester County, South Carolina, and local beekeepers say the mass death was a result of the county spraying the area with the controversial pesticide Naled on [August 28] in an effort to combat Zika-spreading mosquitoes.

[...] A single apiary in Summerville, South Carolina lost 2.5 million bees in 46 hives, according to a local resident [...] Kristina Solara Litzenberger.

[...] "Without honeybees, we have no food", Litzenberger added. "Additionally, one can only deduct that if that much damage was caused to the bees, how will this affect people, wildlife, and the ecosystem?"

Beekeepers are supposed to be warned prior to any pesticide spraying, so that they can cover their hives to protect them. But local bee owners say they were not given any warning about Sunday's spraying, according to the local news station WCBD--and this was also the first time the community was subjected to aerial spraying, rather than spraying from trucks.

[...] Naled is a particularly dangerous pesticide, as the Miami Herald reported earlier this month:

Several studies suggest that long-term exposure to even low levels of Naled can have serious health effects for children and infants as well as wildlife, including butterflies and bees, for whom exposure can be lethal. Some studies suggest it might have neurological and developmental effects on human fetuses, including on brain size, echoing the severe consequences that eradication of the Aedes aegypti mosquito that carries the Zika virus is meant to prevent.

[...] The EU banned the chemical's use in Europe in 2012.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @01:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @01:27AM (#396837)

    Makes me wonder if the hypothesis that babies having small brains after exposure to Zika is indeed purely due to spraying of pesticides and then blaming birth defects on Zika?

    Two links to writings on this by Dr. Mercola:

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/06/07/zika-virus-threat.aspx#! [mercola.com]
    "It's possible Zika-carrying mosquitoes could be involved in suspected cases of microcephaly, but there are other factors that should be considered as well. For starters, the outbreak occurred in a largely poverty-stricken agricultural area of Brazil that uses large amounts of banned pesticides. ..."

    https://www.scribd.com/document/322860653/Zika-Brazil-Admits-It-s-Not-the-Virus [scribd.com]
    "While there is some evidence suggesting Zika virus may be linked to the birth defect microcephaly, and the virus has been spreading throughout Brazil, rates of the condition have only risen to very high rates in the northeast section of Brazil. Since the virus has spread throughout Brazil, but extremely high rates of microcephaly have not, officials are now being forced to admit that something else is likely at play. ... Data compiled by Marinho and colleagues, which has been submitted for publication, suggest socio-economic factors may be involved. Most of the women who gave birth to babies with microcephaly were poor and lived in small cities or on the outskirts of big cities. In addition, the outbreak occurred in a largely poverty-stricken agricultural area of Brazil that uses large amounts of banned pesticides."

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:02AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:02AM (#396853)

    Mercola is a fucktard asshole who made his money selling tanning beds (aka cancer boxes). He even had the fucking gall to claim that "tanning beds decrease melanoma risk." [mercola.com] The FTC levied $5M in fines on him for that bullshit.

    NOTHING that shit head says should ever be trusted.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @12:55PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @12:55PM (#397008)

      You must not have heard that adequate vitamin D helps prevent cancer, which is why tanning with the right wavelengths (UVB, which Mercola sells) is indeed good for you because the benefits outweigh the risks.
      "Higher levels of vitamin D correspond to lower cancer risk"
      https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160406165254.htm [sciencedaily.com]

      A lot of people who die of melanomas get them where the shun does not shine. Explain that.
      https://smarttan.com/news/index.php/more-sunlight-related-to-lower-melanoma-risk-in-new-study/ [smarttan.com]

      That said, it is best to get you vitamin D from natural sunlight. Typical tanning beds don't have the right spectrum (too much UVA) and pills that supplement vitamin D may still not fully provide all the beneficial reactions sunlight makes happen in the skin. Two problems with using natural sunlight are that people don't get enough these days with indoor living and also people bathe every day so the natural skin oils where vitamin D is created from UVB get washed off.

      Whether for bees or people, the further we get away from the natural environment we are adapted for (whether absence of sunlight or presence of synthetic neurotoxins in pesticides or lead in gasoline), the more likely we will suffer ill health from it.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @03:18PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @03:18PM (#397036)

    More on the theme that things may be more complex:
    http://www.naturalnews.com/052863_Zika_virus_Tdap_vaccine_GMO_mosquitoes.html [naturalnews.com]
    "For decades, Zika transmission was extremely rare. The virus didn't start spreading until after 2012 – right after the biotech company Oxitec released genetically modified mosquitoes en masse in Brazil. Zika outbreaks quickly exploded from sites where genetically modified mosquitoes were released to combat dengue. Zika has now spread to 21 other countries and territories. ...
        In 2014, the Brazilian Minister of Health mandated that all expectant mothers receive the new Tdap vaccine. This meant that, at 20 weeks gestation, a vulnerable, developing young life would be exposed to aluminum adjuvant, mercury preservative, formaldehyde, antibiotics and a host of other chemicals that could damage a fetus's developing brain. It's no coincidence that birth defects have spiked in Brazil because of the toxic elements that fetuses have been exposed to.
        It's also very obvious why Zika is being blamed for the birth defects. The biotech industry is using Zika virus to cover up three science experiments that have gone bad (Tdap vaccines, insecticides, GM mosquitoes). In this way, nature can be blamed, more insecticides and vaccines can be sold, and more GM mosquitoes can be released. The public is taught to fear nature even more and stop reproducing. ..."