Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 13 2016, @03:03AM   Printer-friendly
from the between-the-sheets dept.

A new camera can distinguish layers of ink hidden by several layers of ink and paper, and could also be used to analyze paintings:

MIT researchers and their colleagues are designing an imaging system that can read closed books. In the latest issue of Nature Communications, the researchers describe a prototype of the system, which they tested on a stack of papers, each with one letter printed on it. The system was able to correctly identify the letters on the top nine sheets. "The Metropolitan Museum in New York showed a lot of interest in this, because they want to, for example, look into some antique books that they don't even want to touch," says Barmak Heshmat, a research scientist at the MIT Media Lab and corresponding author on the new paper. He adds that the system could be used to analyze any materials organized in thin layers, such as coatings on machine parts or pharmaceuticals.

Also at TechCrunch.

Terahertz time-gated spectral imaging for content extraction through layered structures (open, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12665) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @03:07AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @03:07AM (#401095)

    This could replace the rapiscan machine the TSA use. They could see under the skin, the rule 34 possibility are endless...

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @03:52AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @03:52AM (#401110)

    Reading the charred scrolls from Herculaneum is a similar problem, though more difficult because of their geometry. Maybe this terahertz technique would be applicable there. I'm guessing that terahertz waves are easier to generate than coherent X-rays.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/21/science/more-progress-made-toward-learning-contents-of-herculaneum-scrolls.html [nytimes.com]
    http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6895 [nature.com]

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Fnord666 on Tuesday September 13 2016, @04:33AM

    by Fnord666 (652) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @04:33AM (#401123) Homepage
    But can it read through the mask on lottery tickets?
    • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Eristone on Tuesday September 13 2016, @04:39AM

      by Eristone (4775) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @04:39AM (#401124)

      or the down cards when playing blackjack or any other casino game....

      • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:53AM

        by Gravis (4596) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:53AM (#401218)

        or the down cards when playing blackjack or any other casino game....

        no. [soylentnews.org]

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday September 13 2016, @04:50AM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday September 13 2016, @04:50AM (#401127) Journal

      Can it be implanted in my eyeball?

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Tuesday September 13 2016, @07:53AM

      by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @07:53AM (#401182)

      Or "secure" envelopes with banking information?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @08:40AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @08:40AM (#401203)

        Or "secure" envelopes

        This was what came first to my mind, too. I've been using dead-tree mail for messages I'd prefer to communicate in person, but cannot due to physical distance.

        I may start sending my letters within a crimp-sealed foil packet now.

      • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:54AM

        by Gravis (4596) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:54AM (#401219)

        yes! [soylentnews.org]

    • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:53AM

      by Gravis (4596) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:53AM (#401217)

      no. [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:52AM

    by Gravis (4596) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:52AM (#401215)

    The system exploits the fact that trapped between the pages of a book are tiny air pockets only about 20 micrometers deep. The difference in refractive index — the degree to which they bend light — between the air and the paper means that the boundary between the two will reflect terahertz radiation back to a detector.
    so what this is actually measuring is not the ink but the air between the pages. this won't let you see what on the other side of things unless it's pressed up against something else that is static and very very close.

    • (Score: 2) by bd on Tuesday September 13 2016, @10:14AM

      by bd (2773) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @10:14AM (#401222)

      No, you are measuring the difference of thickness of the pages. The air just needs to be there so that you get individual reflections from the pages. Otherwise, what you would measure would be the (not very useful) overall thickness of the book. It could also work if pages are fixed together with glue that has high refractive index.

      A more fundamental limitation is the THz wavelength (in the mm range), which limits the axial resolution of the image. This technology will be fundamentally unusable to produce sharp images of smaller font sizes.

      Another fundamental limitation is absorption. It may work for paper, but that does not necessarily mean it will work for parchment or the charred papyrus from Herculaneum. (Of course, with the papyrus, there may not be sufficient gaps). Metal based ink will propably work like a mirror and occlude text beneath it.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday September 13 2016, @01:07PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @01:07PM (#401270) Journal

    Hmm, perhaps now I will be able to understand my wife...

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by requerdanos on Tuesday September 13 2016, @03:52PM

    by requerdanos (5997) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @03:52PM (#401351) Journal

    What TFS says:

    Terahertz Imaging System Can "Read" Closed Books

    Let's think about that given other info in tfs.

    they tested on a stack of papers, each with one letter printed on it. The system was able to correctly identify the letters on the top nine sheets.

    Now, let's apply that knowledge to a corrected title:

    Prototype Terahertz Imaging System Might Precede A System Someday Able To "Read" Closed Books But It For Sure Can't Do It Right Now At One Letter Per Page Through Just Nine Pages

    There. Fixed. I wish them well. Scanning books sure would be a lot easier (easier to do, and easier on the books) if you didn't have to open them to do it!

  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday September 13 2016, @05:08PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday September 13 2016, @05:08PM (#401402)

    Just make people write/draw in lead ink and paint, and use a 3D X-ray machine. That already worked 15 years ago.
    Now, let me go get my time machine to teach lead processing techniques to the ancients. What could possibly go wrong?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @10:26PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 13 2016, @10:26PM (#401492)

      ლ) Dude's gone and poisoned the Romans.