Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday September 19 2016, @09:12AM   Printer-friendly

The Colonial Pipeline spill has caused 6 states (Tennessee, Virginia, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, and North Carolina) to declare a state of emergency. Gasoline (petrol) prices on the east coast are likely to spike. Yet, most puzzling is how this vast emergency and its likely effect on cost of living has gone unnoticed by mainstream media outlets. The pipeline is owned by Koch Industries: is this why the media is silent?

[Are there any Soylentils in the affected area who can corroborate this story? Have you heard of the spill, seen long gas lines, or any price gouging? -Ed.]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by rts008 on Monday September 19 2016, @01:08PM

    by rts008 (3001) on Monday September 19 2016, @01:08PM (#403712)

    And your point is...what, exactly?

    If the money spent on pipeline mishap cleanup and repair over the decades, was spent on advancing clean power infrastructure instead, we would not be having this conversation.

    Instead, the rich get richer at our expense, AND we have to pay to fix their fuck-ups, yet again. I'm sick and tired of it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 19 2016, @01:30PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday September 19 2016, @01:30PM (#403729)

    My point is: pipelines are a lot worse for the environment than most people think. They _can_ be operated cleanly, but at greater expense, and that's not why pipelines are built. Pipelines are built to save money.

    "Advancing clean power infrastructure" is a noble goal, one I hope we pursue.

    Meanwhile, your 401(k) is calling for higher returns, this quarter, and clean power infrastructure doesn't support that goal.

    --
    Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://news.stanford.edu/2023/02/17/will-russia-ukraine-war-end
    • (Score: 2) by rts008 on Monday September 19 2016, @01:37PM

      by rts008 (3001) on Monday September 19 2016, @01:37PM (#403740)

      Well, until your last sentence, we are in agreement.
      There is no 'my 401k', that disappeared in 2008 with the 'crash'.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @01:45PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @01:45PM (#403749)

        That makes 0 sense unless you did not invest your 401K into an Index fund, as all those stocks not only rebounded but also increased year over year.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @02:34PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @02:34PM (#403782)

      Unless you are just about to retire, your 401k probably shouldn't care less about 1 quarters performance and be invested for the long term.

      America, long term, ROFLMAO.