SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the giving-BSOD-a-whole-new-meaning dept.
Microsoft has vowed to "solve the problem of cancer" within a decade by using ground-breaking computer science to crack the code of diseased cells so they can be reprogrammed back to a healthy state.
[...] The researchers are even working on a computer made from DNA which could live inside cells and look for faults in bodily networks, like cancer. If it spotted cancerous chances it would reboot the system and clear out the diseased cells.
Chris Bishop, laboratory director at Microsoft Research, said: "I think it's a very natural thing for Microsoft to be looking at because we have tremendous expertise in computer science and what is going on in cancer is a computational problem.
[Continues...]
Dr. Lowe, from In the Pipeline, is not convinced that Microsoft is being realistic with their "molecular computer" that will cure cancer:
We're not even near understanding what's going on in normal cells or cancerous ones, so giving people the impression that you've already simulated everything important and you're busy "debugging" it is not only arrogant, it's close to irresponsible.
[...] If you remove the hubris from the Microsoft announcement, though, which takes sandblasters and water cannons, you get to something that could be interesting. It's another machine learning approach to biology, from what I can make out, and I'm not opposed in principle to that sort of thing at all. It has to be approached with caution, though, because any application of machine learning to the biology literature has to take into account that a good percentage of that literature is crap, and that negative results (which have great value for these systems) are grievously underrepresented in it as well.
[...] So if Microsoft wants to apply machine learning to cancer biology, I'm all for it. But they should just go and try it and report back when something interesting comes out of it, rather than beginning by making a big noise in the newspapers. You want to cure cancer? Go do it; don't sit around giving interviews about how you're going to cure cancer real soon now.
Note: Bold added by submitter.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/09/20/microsoft-will-solve-cancer-within-10-years-by-reprogramming-dis/
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2016/09/21/better-faster-more-comprehensive-manure-distribution
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 22 2016, @06:56PM
Something you see so often from failing and poorly managed restaurants is that they'll start freaking out. Luigi saves up and finally opens up Luigi's Italian Diner. But after 2 months it's not making a profit, so it's freak out time. Suddenly it's Luigi's Italian and Hamburgers Diner. The burgers are pretty shitty though. Luigi doesn't put his heart into them. And the burgers aren't doing it so it becomes Luigi's Italian and Burgers and Japanese Diner. That doesn't work so they start increasing the price for the remaining customers they do have. It's like struggling in quicksand. If that analogy isn't familiar - don't do that.
Microsoft realized OS sales are tied to OEM sales and as hardware iteration rapidly declined, so did their profits. Since then they've seemingly become everything and they keep failing everywhere. In 2015 they stated by 2018 they'd have their new 'free-to-play' OS installed on a billion devices. Nope. Okay, no problem. They'll just become the kings of AI - that's big, right? Shit shit shit, our AI turned into a bugged out Hitler spamming Nazi bot. No problem! Self driving cars, those are big right? We'll become a software vendor for self driving technology! And now they're going to become a biotech company. It's getting to be rather humorous. Shall we lay the line at 3 months before Microsoft refashions itself to become the new source for solar cells? Because renewable energy, that's big.. right? Ah screw it, they should start selling sushi.