Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday September 29 2016, @03:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the is-it-okay-if-they-pay-me? dept.

While waiting for ten minutes on "hold" to make an appointment with my local branch of Scotiabank, I had time read through the new "Digital Services Agreement. Most of the eighteen pages were unremarkable, but a couple of things stood out.

When you click "Accept", you are agreeing to not give your password to police if they ask!

You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality and safekeeping of your Card, Card Number, Username, and Electronic Signature. ... These responsibilities include:

  - not voluntarily disclosing your Electronic Signature to anyone else at any time, including any family member, friend, law enforcement agency, or financial institution employee;

You're also agreeing to not use "public" wifi:

(These responsibilities include:) using your own private wireless data connection, and avoiding use of public Wi-Fi services, when you are using the Digital Services;

This of course is from a bank that still refuses to allow Uppercase letters or Special characters in a password.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Beige on Thursday September 29 2016, @06:12AM

    by Beige (3989) on Thursday September 29 2016, @06:12AM (#407757) Homepage

    Clearly legitimate LEOs are not going to call you and ask for login information to your bank account. They can get whatever information they need from the bank itself with a subpoena.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by isostatic on Thursday September 29 2016, @06:24AM

    by isostatic (365) on Thursday September 29 2016, @06:24AM (#407760) Journal

    People who fall for phishing are not going to read an 18 page EULA.

    It's all about covering the bank's ass because of their inadequate security measures.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 29 2016, @07:29AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 29 2016, @07:29AM (#407771)

      It's both.

      It's about covering the banks ass when a customer gives his password to a phisher pretending to be law enforcement, because "legitimate LEOs are not going to call you and ask for login information to your bank account".