Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday October 05 2016, @10:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the pack-the-surfboard dept.

Cassini gravity measurements and a new model indicate that Dione may have a subsurface ocean like several other bodies in the solar system:

Saturn's moon Dione has joined the growing list of watery bodies in our solar system. Data from NASA's Cassini probe indicate that a liquid ocean some 20 miles deep exists far below the icy surface of the moon. This means that its interior looks similar to two other Saturnian moons, Titan and Enceladus, both of which hide vast oceans beneath a thin crust of ice. Dione is likely different in at least one respect though: the data indicate it's ocean buried much deeper.

The researchers based their analysis on gravity measurements taken by the Cassini spacecraft as it flew by Dione, tracking subtle shifts in the trajectory of the craft due to Dione's gravitational pull. Similar methods have been used before, but the data always seem to indicate that Dione had no such subterranean ocean. The new data, combined with a revised model of how the moon's crust should behave, changes that assumption. [...] Dione now joins Titan, Enceladus, Europa, Ganymede and Pluto as the solar system's wettest places — beyond Earth. And, given that we seem to find new bodies of liquid water every time we take a closer look at our solar system, more are likely to come.

Dione and Enceladus.

Enceladus' and Dione's floating ice shells supported by minimum stress isostasy (DOI: 10.1002/2016GL070650) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05 2016, @01:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05 2016, @01:53PM (#410591)

    Let me say it clearly so there is no misunderstanding: the 'space program' is a hoax. This "Cassini" story is out only to support the Heliocentric model. Sure the scientists behind the publication may have no clue, as the data is given to them (ceremoniously) and they have no control of or access to the data obtaining instrument. No matter how hard you try, you will find nor a curvature to the Earth, consistent with that of a convex sphere 6397 km average radius, neither evidence that it is spinning.

    Some guys, at the 1700's, allegedly 'measured' the distance to the Sun using the transit of Venus. This was passed into the schoolbooks as fact and was "verified" by NASA "using radar" back in the 1950's.

    The same thing happened with the Cavendish's "gravity" experiment in the 18th, and the so-called "Fouceault's Pendulum" sometime in the 19th century. Both were inconclusive, but rushed into the education system without debate or questioning as facts, in support of the Heliocentric theory. "Foucault's" pendulums where hastily set up in science museums around the world to "prove" the "simple fact" of the rotation of the Earth, but all are made of ferrous metallic material and are mechanically driven.

    This is an ERRONEOUS application of the scientific method, as those claims are not verifiable, experiments were not repeated, and all "space facts" originate from the same source which is a proven and consistent liar.

    Imagine having a million dollars. With only a tiny tad of planning, you would probably never ever have to work in your life again. NASA is siphoning FIFTEEN (15) million dollars per day, and still does not provide uninterrupted 24/7 reality TV of her alleged "space station" and "EVA"s.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Troll=1, Funny=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday October 05 2016, @02:50PM

    by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Wednesday October 05 2016, @02:50PM (#410622) Journal

    You get a ribbon for space article attendance.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Wednesday October 05 2016, @04:33PM

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Wednesday October 05 2016, @04:33PM (#410691) Journal

    Let's skip over all the conspiracy nonsense and address the only vaguely sane point in the above rant:

    NASA is siphoning FIFTEEN (15) million dollars per day,

    What exactly do you think NASA does with that money? Do you think they shovel it into the fuel tanks of the spacecraft and then burn it all up?
    No, they spend it. They spend it on materials, fuels, high-tech parts, tools and equipment. Most of all, they pay the wages of thousands of engineers, administrators, astronauts, IT folks, telephone sanitizers and who knows who else.

    In other words, those FIFTEEN (15) million dollars per day get pumped straight back in to the economy, enabling people to support businesses and businesses to build and invent cool stuff and in fact entire industries to exist at all. Oh, and, you know, build cool stuff and advance human knowledge and explore other planets and invent and test out all kinds of new technologies in the process.

    If you want to talk about wasted money look at the military, which makes NASA look like a homeless guy begging for change.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05 2016, @09:21PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05 2016, @09:21PM (#410836)

      You are arguing over the price of beans with a dude who denies the existence of beans.