Johnson & Johnson has issued a security warning about one of its products:
Johnson & Johnson on Tuesday issued a warning about a possible cybersecurity issue with its Animas OneTouch Ping Insulin Infusion Pump. The problem was first reported by Reuters.
Computer security firm Rapid 7 discovered that it might be possible to take control of the pump via its an unencrypted radio frequency communication system that allows it to send commands and information via a wireless remote control. The company alerted Johnson & Johnson, which issued the warning. Getting too high or too low a dose of insulin could severely sicken or even kill. There have been no instances of the pumps being hacked, Johnson & Johnson said.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05 2016, @05:06PM
So, an authenticated device will have some algorithm that matches the insulin pump for authentication? I'm not sure where you're going with this, that system could still be sniffed and spoofed. Also, if I was using one of these I would still prefer that the commands be encrypted so that some bored hacker can't start playing around. 3 digit security shouldn't take too long to brute force, and I don't think disabling the device over bad connection attempts is acceptable in this case...
I don't know how the French cards will handle that, but locking a bank account at least does not have immediate life and death consequences.
(Score: 1) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Wednesday October 05 2016, @08:17PM
Tree words:
Public key Encryption.
It can be used to authenticate, without encrypting the actual data by encrypting a secure hash of the data.
Useful if you are prohibited by law from encrypting the pay-load.