Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday October 19 2016, @01:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the freedom-of-the-press dept.

Amy Goodman, host of the New York City-based leftist news programme Democracy Now! was charged with criminal trespass by the North Dakota state's attorney (prosecutor). The charge was changed to riot, then was dismissed due to lack of evidence when Goodman appeared in court on Monday. The charges stemmed from her presence at a protest in September against construction of the Dakota Access (Bakken) oil pipeline, after the protest was reported on her show.

Coverage:


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday October 19 2016, @09:56PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday October 19 2016, @09:56PM (#416368) Journal
    Apparently, the project has already passed EPA approval. So they must have something to show for plans on cleaning up spills. One thing about spills from pipelines is that they tend to be very easy to shut down and contain compared to rail car accidents (and you'll never have a string of states affected by a single leak). I've read of several Alaska Pipeline spills, for example, including at least two cases of sabotage/vandalism, and none of the spills ended up being significant. For example, in 1978 someone blew a one inch hole in the pipeline resulting in the largest spill of 16,000 barrels of oil. While pipeline spills tend to be larger, railroad accidents from North Dakota have been rather numerous.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday October 20 2016, @11:33AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday October 20 2016, @11:33AM (#416579) Journal

    Yeah that's the other point. There are a lot of other pipelines that cross the country. They keep a lot of trucks and train cars off the road that would otherwise transport that product, which saves CO2 itself. Adding another doesn't seem to matter that much.

    In this case I think it was the environmental lobby trying to find another issue to fundraise on. They haven't gotten much love from the Obama administration, and their coffers must be getting low at this point. Their lawyers and lobbyists have expensive homes and lifestyles in DC they have to maintain, you know. The thing is they've been throwing stuff against the wall for the last eight years, hoping that something would stick that they could farm for dollars. They tried the Pacific trash gyre. They tried banning microbeads, the tiny plastic bits put in soaps and toothpaste as abrasives. They tried to attack another pipeline that already crosses the great lakes underwater. They also tried to push tiny homes and entomophagy, but that didn't catch on because what country do they think this is? The Keystone Pipeline was the only one they got any traction with, but god knows why.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.