Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday October 26 2016, @04:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the duke-nukem-forever dept.

Various news outlets report that Unit 2 of the Watts Bar nuclear power plant, owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), has begun operation. The reactor is rated at 1.15 GW and cost $4.7 billion ($4.09 per watt). Ground was broken on the project in 1973; construction work was suspended from 1985 to 2007.

Watts Bar Unit 1, which began operation in 1996, is one of three plants which manufacture tritium under contract to the U.S. government for use in hydrogen bombs.

Around the United States, 99 other commercial nuclear reactors are in operation and four others are under construction:

[...] Scana Corp./SCE&G's V.C. Summer Units 2 and 3 in South Carolina and Southern Co.'s Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in Georgia.

In related news, the TVA is taking bids for its unfinished Bellefonte Nuclear Generating Station in fabulous Hollywood, Alabama. It has received a bid of $38 million.

coverage:

previously:
US Regulators Issue First Nuclear Plant Operating License Since 1996


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 26 2016, @08:52AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 26 2016, @08:52AM (#418895)

    Did anyone else think $4.09 per watt is a bit of strange metric? What does it tell you? Wouldn't it be more interesting to divide this number over the planned running time?

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday October 26 2016, @10:37AM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Wednesday October 26 2016, @10:37AM (#418916) Homepage Journal

    Would 95% of the power necessary to energize a flux capacitor suit you better?

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by Zinho on Wednesday October 26 2016, @06:30PM

      by Zinho (759) on Wednesday October 26 2016, @06:30PM (#419084)

      Came looking for a Back To The Future reference, was not disappointed. Bravo!

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Wednesday October 26 2016, @05:21PM

    by Aiwendil (531) on Wednesday October 26 2016, @05:21PM (#419055) Journal

    It is strange but not for that reason. Nuclear (like most large scale power plants) tends to have their cost expressed as "cost per installed kW nameplate capacity" to more easily compare (powerplants exist at roughly every 20MW interval between 20 and 800MW and every 50MW up to about 1450MW so $/kW is very handy for comparisons).

    4090$/kW puts it at about normal for US (slightly above france, quite a bit above s.korea, russia and china).

    Search on the phrase "overnight costs" to see how it often is used.