Here's 100 Years of Proof That Girls Are Better Students Than Boys. In all subjects, even math and science.
In 2006, Newsweek magazine declared it, loud, on their cover: America's boys were in crisis. Boys were falling behind their female counterparts in school. They were getting worse grades, lagging on standardized tests, and not attending college in the same numbers as girls. "By almost every benchmark," Peg Tyre, the author of the cover story, wrote, "boys across the nation and in every demographic group are falling behind." And so it began-the end of men, but also an ongoing conversation on how to better boys' performance in the classroom. From the article:
This "boy crisis," however, was based on an assumption: that males had previously been on top. Granted, there was evidence to support that idea. For one, educational institutions for most of modern history have been openly sexist, favoring boys. And traditionally, males had outperformed girls in standardized tests and in math and science. But "by the mid-1990s, girls had reduced the gap in math, and more girls than boys were taking high-school-level biology and chemistry," Tyre wrote.
The assumption that boys had been the better students didn't seem right to (married) researchers Daniel and Susan Voyer of the University of New Brunswick in Canada. "I've been collecting grade data for a long time," Daniel Voyer says in a phone interview. "Typically if you find gender differences, they are in favor of girls - it doesn't matter what it is. So it started to kind of puzzle me." And so the pair set out to test, collecting every study they could find on grades and gender since 1914 and crunching the numbers in a mega-meta analysis, the first of its kind.
While the girls' advantage is largest in reading and language studies, it exists for all subjects, even math and science. And though they tested data from across the world, the Voyers found the gender gap was largest in the United States.
What's most striking is that the gender gap held across the decades. If the boy crisis existed, they would have seen boys' performance peak and fall over time. That wasn't the case. "Boys have been lagging for a long time and ... this is a fairly stable phenomenon," the paper concluded.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 02 2014, @11:41AM
I was also a boy who tired of being held back by the status quo. I read ahead in the textbooks out of interest and lack of anything else of worth to do in a classroom, and mastered subjects before the teacher had taught them. By the time I actually needed homework and study skills for something really difficult, it was too late. Thanks, public schools.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by buswolley on Friday May 02 2014, @04:47PM
Maybe. I'm not sure.
However, I think the school setting as it currently stands does not do men well. I think that many men would do better under a small tribal learning environment...like a hunter squad in the hunter-gatherer years, or the apprenticeships of the last centuries. In college I would do something like:
Professor->2-5 male graduate students->Each graduate student has a small squad of undergraduates (15) that he dorms with, and commands their educational priorities. Part of their time would be in their class work, and part of their time would be working on the graduate student's research as lab assistants. All is graded. The grades are determined by the achievements of the squad.
subicular junctures