Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday October 29 2016, @09:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the VERY-stiff-upper-lip dept.

"A former soldier cut off two of his gangrene-ridden toes with a pair of tin metal pliers without anesthetic in his living room after becoming frustrated at a six-week delay to being operated on by the National Health Service (NHS)."

[...] "He says he eventually developed gangrene and his doctor said his infected toes would have to be removed. Rather than wait six weeks for the operation, Dibbins took matters into his own hands.

He says the operation, performed without pain killers and in his living room while biting on a rolled up towel, took about an hour. His wife of 40 years was in the house but says she did not want to look.

“Knowing that it would take at least another six weeks to get me in front of a surgeon again, that’s when I bit the bullet and cut off the toes,” Dibbins told the North Devon Journal.

“I did it because it’s what had to be done. My doctor told me my toes were going to kill me."

https://www.rt.com/uk/364152-gangrene-frostbite-toes-cut/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by edIII on Saturday October 29 2016, @11:33PM

    by edIII (791) on Saturday October 29 2016, @11:33PM (#420343)

    Yeah, but if I was a soldier who had sacrificed for his country and it was just some rich fuckers who didn't want to pay their fair share?

    They would lose the same toes along with me, in the same surgery. Either that, or they could pay for my surgery. Whatever would happen, somebody else would losing something too.

    It's absolutely horrific how we treat soldiers, and we never learn. We're about to have another bonus army march on Washington D.C here with the National Guard soldiers too.

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday October 29 2016, @11:43PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 29 2016, @11:43PM (#420350) Journal
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 29 2016, @11:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 29 2016, @11:53PM (#420359)

    I can broadly agree with what you're saying - the remuneration for soldiers has long been a sticking point.

    Just one thing remains:

    Please define this "fair share" thing you're talking about.

    What are its salient characteristics?

    How will we know what constitutes a "fair share"?

    What markers are available for determining what is more than a "fair share" and what is less?

    I hear about so many "fair" things in politics, but nobody seems to want to define them.