Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday November 04 2016, @07:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the how-did-THAT-happen? dept.

The composition of Infosys' U.S. workforce is too lopsided -- overwhelmingly South Asian -- to be an accident, allege the plaintiffs in a discrimination lawsuit.

The plaintiffs, four IT workers from around the U.S., brought their discrimination lawsuit against the India-based IT services giant in 2013. This week, they filed a motion seeking class-action certification from 2009, and say the potential pool of plaintiffs may be as large as 125,000.
...
Neumark wrote that "the share of South Asian workers in Infosys' United States-based workforce, when compared to the relevant labor market, is 301.17 standard deviations higher, and the statistical likelihood that this disparity is due to chance -- as opposed to a systematic difference in hiring favoring one group over the other -- is less than 0.0000001%, or less than 1 in 1 billion."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 04 2016, @08:46PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 04 2016, @08:46PM (#422620)

    >End of story, no contracts, unless you consider a verbal agreement to come back next week a "contract". (Yes, that might be enforceable in some courts, but good luck with proving a contract was violated!)

    Ofcourse it is a contract, you fucking retard.
    It was a promise for a promise.
    X promises to pay Y
    Y promises to do work for X

    It is to be completed within the year (one week later).
    It is below the statutory amount for a required writing (how much is a lawn? 100 dollars?, way way below the SOF requirement).
    It is not a contract for the sale of land nor one with marriage in mind.

    So yes: it is enforceable, it is a contract, and yes the court will entertain it, listen to the claims, and decided.

    You are against men having female children as brides, you are cattle, so I'm not surprised you don't know this you fucking retarded piece of shit.

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday November 05 2016, @12:27AM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday November 05 2016, @12:27AM (#422691) Journal

    Like I said - good luck enforcing a verbal contract. He said, she said, blah blah blah - how many lawyers are going to take a case like that, without charging far more than the dispute is even worth? That's the kind of case only an idiot would go to court for. "Your honor, dude owes me $150, and I'm going to need that money to pay toward the ten thousand my lawyer is charging!"

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 05 2016, @01:37AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 05 2016, @01:37AM (#422704)

      Thats why you have small claims court. You do have those in your backwards country don't you?