SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the most-employees-are-not-in-Office-most-of-the-day dept.
A recent article in PCWorld reveals that many companies are simply throwing money away:
Organisations are wasting money licensing Microsoft Office applications that the majority of employees barely use, a study released this week by application analytics startup SoftWatch has found. Conclusion: many users could easly be migrated to far cheaper cloud applications such as Google Apps.
The firm carried out a 3-month analysis of Office suite use in 51 global firms representing 148,500 employees, revealing that seven out of ten employees weren't using any single application heavily, launching them only for viewing or light editing.
The average employee spent only 48 minutes per day using Office, largely the Outlook email client, which consumed about 68 percent of that activity. Excel was in second place with 17 percent, or an average of 8 minutes per day, leaving Word and PowerPoint trailing with only 5 minutes and 2 minutes per day each.
That email is popular and spreadsheets and presentations less so is not a surprise. The latter are occasional applications that non-specialist employees use only when they really have to and their importance can't necessarily be measured in terms of how often they are used so much as the impact that use has.
(Score: 2) by mendax on Sunday May 04 2014, @02:40AM
There are very few things writing-wise that I have had to do in my work life that I could not do in Wordpad. I think that fact says a lot about the usefulness of having access to MS Office or any other office suite for most people. So, if a company is going to provide an office suite to its employees, why not provide a good but cheap one? OpenOffice and LibreOffice are as cheap as you can get and are pretty well-featured and stable.
It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.