Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Tuesday December 06 2016, @03:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the money-is-murder dept.

The Rainbow Vegetarian Café in Cambridge, England, has announced that it will not accept the new £5 polymer notes, introduced by the Bank of England in September. Last week the British vegan community discovered that the notes contain trace amounts of beef tallow, which is animal fat, and are therefore unacceptable by their cruelty-free standards. A heated online controversy has resulted, including a petition asking the Bank to remove tallow from the polymer.

The Rainbow Café's owner, Sharon Meijland, told The Telegraph that her stance was announced last Wednesday, at the end of a BBC radio interview on the unrelated topic of Christmas food.

"We sponsor the Vegan Fair and announced on Wednesday we would not be accepting the £5 notes because they are dubious ethically. We have been providing food for vegans for 30 years and have tried to be as ethical as we possibly can...This is not just a restaurant, it's a restaurant where tiny details like this are really important."

Is any of our money cruelty-free?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by darnkitten on Tuesday December 06 2016, @05:30PM

    by darnkitten (1912) on Tuesday December 06 2016, @05:30PM (#437864)

    I've been following this for about a week now.

    The Bank of England is already looking for "potential solutions" [bbc.com] to the problem of using tallow, which is added to the plastic note to reduce static [bbc.co.uk].

    Vegans and vegetarians aren't the only ones upset over this; there have also been protests from the Jain (summary article), Sikh, [bbc.com] and Hindu [bbc.co.uk] communities.

    As to the Rainbow Cafe [bbc.com] in question--they say that they are willing to "try to find an alternative and accommodate [customers] in some way," if they come in with only new fivers, but note that they haven't had any problems from customers or from the local community, where they have operated for 30 years, since posting the notice that they would not be accepting the new notes.

    From the article in the summary:

    Mrs Meijland said she could not believe the amount of online abuse the café had been getting since announcing the policy. She said: "I'm 66 now and this abuse leaves me very frightened, it's so horrible that we try to do the right ethical thing and it ends up like this.

    "No-one from Cambridge has given us any abuse, it's all further afield from areas like Manchester and so on. ..."[W]e don't need the publicity, the decision not to accept the note was originally mentioned at the very end of a radio interview."

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by vux984 on Wednesday December 07 2016, @12:07AM

    by vux984 (5045) on Wednesday December 07 2016, @12:07AM (#438137)

    "Mrs Meijland said she could not believe the amount of online abuse the café had been getting since announcing the policy."

    Maybe it is because they are insane?

    http://www.rainbowcafe.co.uk/our-food/ [rainbowcafe.co.uk]

    "All eggs used are free range"

    They won't accept fiver's with tallow in them... but they *serve* food made with eggs. WTF.

    " We recycle everything possible and work as a team effort, by choice everyone is Vegetarian or Vegan, and leftovers are taken home: and even plate scrapings are recycled to my large flock of chickens, "

    lolwut... ?? I certainly hope they aren't feeding any of the food scraps from food they make with free range eggs... TO the chickens.

    Talk about a blind spot.

    • (Score: 1) by dr_barnowl on Wednesday December 07 2016, @09:41AM

      by dr_barnowl (1568) on Wednesday December 07 2016, @09:41AM (#438269)

      The amount of animal fat accumulating on those notes from humans touching them is probably larger than the amount of tallow in them.

      • (Score: 2) by darnkitten on Wednesday December 07 2016, @06:27PM

        by darnkitten (1912) on Wednesday December 07 2016, @06:27PM (#438453)

        True.

        The perception, though, as I understand it, is that these bills are tainted (or rendered ritually unclean, if you like) by virtue of their manufacturing process. The surface contamination is removable (I know, traces remain after washing, etc., and how many of us actually wash after handling money), but the inherent corruption is not, and may even, in certain belief systems, be able to transfer its status to the handler.

        Ethical considerations aside, removing a physical (and often inadvertent) soiling is generally fairly simple, but cleansing a stain on the soul is usually much more difficult, especially if one knowingly takes it on, as in this case.

        Not only that, but just knowing that something is unclean/tainted can bring about a visceral reaction to it, even if, intellectually, you know that it makes little sense.

        Oh, well; if humans were required to make sense, this would be a much different (and far less interesting) world...