Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday May 06 2014, @02:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the second-chances-come-first dept.

Thought experiment proposed to reconcile psychological versus thermodynamic arrows of time:

A pair of physicists has proposed a thought experiment to help reconcile the seeming disparity between the psychological and thermodynamic arrows of time. In their paper published in the journal Physical Review E, Leonard Mlodinow and Todd Brun claim their thought experiment demonstrates that the two seemingly contradictory views of time, must always align.

When ordinary people think about time, they see the past as something that has come before and the future as a great unknown yet to come. We can remember the past, because it has happened already, but not the future, because it hasn't. Physicists, on the other hand see time as able to move either forward or backwards (towards greater entropy), which implies that we should be able to remember events in the future. So, why can't we?

It's because of the way our memories work the two say, and they've created a thought experiment to demonstrate what they mean. Imagine, they write, two chambers connected by an atomic sized tube with a turnstile in it. If there is gas in one of the chambers, individual atoms of it will move through the tube to the other chamber (towards higher entropy) tripping the turnstile as they go, in effect, counting the atoms as they pass by, until both sides have equal numbers of atoms-creating a state of equilibrium.

http://phys.org/news/2014-05-thought-psychological -thermodynamic-arrows.html

Arrow of Time FAQ

http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/47

http://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysR evE.89.052102

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 06 2014, @05:01PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 06 2014, @05:01PM (#40227)
    QM with ad-hoc wavefunction collapse is, by construction, not reversible. So it's no surprise that it can't handle time-reversal thought experiments. Then again, it doesn't need to: one of the axioms is that dynamics are not time-symmetric, so you get the arrow of time automatically.

    However, this version of QM is more or less ruled out by now. (It would take a much longer post to lay out the case, but essentially experiments have shown larger and larger systems wherein superpositions can be maintained; there is no evidence for collapse kicking in at any particular timescale. Instead it appears that decoherence [wikipedia.org] theory is correct.) Modernly, the accepted version of QM (MWI [wikipedia.org] or similar) has no wavefunction collapse, and everything is microscopically reversible. So any QM experiment you can imagine (dual slit, etc.) can be time-reversed and will behave sensibly, as far as the physics are concerned. Of course if you time-reverse a entropy-increasing operation, then it will be entropy-decreasing (so there is always a thermodynamic arrow of time, defined by the direction of entropy increase); but nothing untoward (e.g. violation of a conservation law) happens.
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1