(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 06 2014, @10:25PM
by Anonymous Coward
on Tuesday May 06 2014, @10:25PM (#40365)
my sarcasm tag It has been noted that I often miss the mirth in a situation, so forgive me if that is the case.
OTOH, if you are completely serious, tag types that are not explicitly supported are stripped away by the Comments engine. If you want < (less than) and > (greater than) to appear with your fictional tags, you must substitute some markup. [google.com]
You could always take the approach of writing/s at the end of sarcasm, [s]around it with brackets[/s], or using parenthesis with italics (like this, as if you couldn't imagine it yourself). Those are the methods I borrowed from others long ago, at least.
(Or just use the simple way of just writing & gt; and & lt; without the spaces.)
(Score: 2) by GlennC on Tuesday May 06 2014, @07:59PM
They'll schedule the vote on that after the community decides on the name
(I tried closing my sarcasm tag, but it didn't show up on the preview.)
Sorry folks...the world is bigger and more varied than you want it to be. Deal with it.
(Score: 3, Funny) by maxwell demon on Tuesday May 06 2014, @08:34PM
Well, then you probably just have to continue being sarcastic :-)
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 06 2014, @10:25PM
my sarcasm tag
It has been noted that I often miss the mirth in a situation, so forgive me if that is the case.
OTOH, if you are completely serious, tag types that are not explicitly supported are stripped away by the Comments engine.
If you want < (less than) and > (greater than) to appear with your fictional tags, you must substitute some markup. [google.com]
-- gewg_
(Score: 1) by Magic Oddball on Wednesday May 07 2014, @09:30AM
You could always take the approach of writing /s at the end of sarcasm, [s]around it with brackets[/s], or using parenthesis with italics (like this, as if you couldn't imagine it yourself). Those are the methods I borrowed from others long ago, at least.
(Or just use the simple way of just writing & gt; and & lt; without the spaces.)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 07 2014, @03:18PM
You mean, > and <? Then why not simply write that? Hint: &
(Score: 2) by GlennC on Thursday May 08 2014, @02:10PM
Thanks for the tips!
Sorry folks...the world is bigger and more varied than you want it to be. Deal with it.