SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the getting-a-charge-out-of-painting dept.
NewAtlas has a story about a new thermoelectric paint which can turn any surface into an electricity generator.
Thermoelectric generators convert heat or cold to electricity (and vice-versa). Normally solid-state devices, they can be used in such things as power plants to convert waste heat into additional electrical power, or in small cooling systems that do not need compressors or liquid coolant. However the rigid construction of these devices generally limits their use to flat, even surfaces. In an effort to apply thermal generation capabilities to almost any shape, scientists at the Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST) in Korea claim to have created a thermoelectric coating that can be directly painted onto most surfaces.
Variously known as the Peltier, Seebeck, or Thomson effect, the thermoelectric effect is seen in semiconductor devices that create a voltage when a different temperature is present on each side or, when a voltage is applied to the device, it creates a temperature difference between the two sides. In this instance, the new paint created by the UNIST researchers is used specifically to heat a surface when a voltage is applied.
The specially-formulated inorganic thermoelectric paint was created using Bi2Te3 (bismuth telluride) and Sb2Te3 (antimony telluride) particles to create two types of semiconducting material. To test the resultant mixture, the researchers applied alternate p-type (positive) and n-type (negative) layers of the thermoelectric semiconductor paint on a metal dome with electrodes at the top and the base of the dome.
Applying a voltage across the electrodes, the researchers were able to measure a temperature gradient from the hot top of the dome to the cooler bottom. According to the researchers, the entire device generated an average power output of 4 mW per square centimeter.
Original Paper (Complete text)
(Score: 3, Interesting) by VLM on Monday December 12 2016, @01:32PM
Another fun math is I'm way to lazy to look it up but a stereotypical TO-220 power transistor case has a surface area somewhat larger than a sq cm but not ridiculously so, and in bare air the thermal resistance is about sixty or so deg/watt so guessing a hundred degrees/watt is reasonable per sq cm. Meanwhile the paper claims peak power output of 4 mW per sq cm at 100C hot side and presumably room temp cold side so we'll call it "somewhat less than a watt thermal" to generate enough temperature to get about four thousandths of a watt out. So we're in no danger of perpetual motion here, figure half a percent efficient.
This shows the paradox of how thermal electric elements can lower efficiency of a plant or whatever. See half a percent of the output of a nuclear power plant is a lot of power and unpressurized condensers operate at boiling water 100C temps so superficially this sounds like free energy. However the TE modules don't run "at" 100C they run across a drop of 100C... Now you're gaining half a percent in the TE modules however running the condensers at 200C instead of 100C means you're losing, oh, I donno, maybe 25% of the power from the turbines for a net loss of 24.5% when you add back in the TE modules. Or you have the immense capex problem of expanding the condenser to cool as much with the TE elements in the way as without, but again it turns out that using the worlds most amazing condenser without the TE modules in the way would result in really cold condensate and more power generated in the turbines than you'd ever get from the TE modules.
Likewise for cooling if it takes a TE module 20 watts to refrigerate 1 watt (which isn't all that far out of line) then if you have a 100 watt CPU and 100 watt heatsink then putting a TE module in between and dumping 2000 watts into the TE module means your poor little 100 watt heatsink has to dump 2100 watts of heat, which it can't, meaning you'll roast the CPU. Or if you bought and installed a 2100 watt heatsink you'd just break even, however, if you bolted that 2100 watt heatsink to the CPU directly, it would run so incredibly cool you'd have to worry about condensation, plus you wouldn't have to pay for the TE modules.
TE modules only "work" for really weird applications, like motion and vibration free cooling of telescope cameras or in general places you don't care about cost or energy efficiency you just want a certain controllable delta-T.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @07:38PM
20:1 IS pretty far out of line for conventional devices -- the one in TFA is just really bad for geometric reasons. Assuming you've chosen a suitable device for the task, rather than having found one that's really too small in your parts box and "making do", COP will be between 0.3 and 1.0; in fact you can get well over 1.0 if you're designing for efficiency above all (you'll need to oversize the TEC at least 3x, and run at a modest ΔT).
See this helpful graph [tetech.com] to follow the numbers in the following paragraph:
You're describing a COP of 0.05, which typically happens when you're running the TEC right at its limits. Assuming that's the case, you should reduce the current a bit, the ΔT would drop just a little, but the COP would improve to 0.1, and you'd need half the power. Conversely, you need to dump half the power, so the gain from using your 2100W heat sink with "only" 1100W would likely outweigh the ΔT reduction. Or, if you really need the high ΔT, use a two-stage system, with each stage seeing half the ΔT, they'll each be operating at much higher COP, and need far less than half the power.
TECs are really quite practical, as long as you can afford to buy the right size for the job, instead of trying to make a smaller one work out in the corners of its capabilities.