SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the google-is-so-smart-it-can-maek-typos-for-us dept.
The NY Times covers in a very in-depth article Google's contribution to the recent revolution in deep learning through its application in Google Translation. A great read that covers the journey from new theories to practice in less than 10 years. This piece is surprising very technical as it tries to explains the history, the people and the technology behind the recent AI revolution. Take the time to read the full story here.
It is, in fact, three overlapping stories that converge in Google Translate's successful metamorphosis to A.I. — a technical story, an institutional story and a story about the evolution of ideas. The technical story is about one team on one product at one company, and the process by which they refined, tested and introduced a brand-new version of an old product in only about a quarter of the time anyone, themselves included, might reasonably have expected. The institutional story is about the employees of a small but influential artificial-intelligence group within that company, and the process by which their intuitive faith in some old, unproven and broadly unpalatable notions about computing upended every other company within a large radius. The story of ideas is about the cognitive scientists, psychologists and wayward engineers who long toiled in obscurity, and the process by which their ostensibly irrational convictions ultimately inspired a paradigm shift in our understanding not only of technology but also, in theory, of consciousness itself.
(Score: 2) by darkfeline on Monday December 19 2016, @08:28AM
Can you post it? My experience with Chinese and Japanese is that Google Translate has gotten a lot better. It still struggles with more academic style writing, but at least for more conversational stuff it's very good (which is surprising given how horrible Translate used to be with Chinese).
Consider the following from Wikipedia: 前項のように、筆は使うほどに本来の筆の持つ能力が引き出されてくるが、それには墨の選び方や洗い方も大事になってくる。
Translate says: As mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the ability of the original brush to draw out as much as you can use the brush will be drawn out, but how to choose ink and how to wash will become more important.
It's still a bit wonky, but I wouldn't call that gibberish.
(The actual translation: As described in the previous paragraph, while the pen's potential is drawn out as it is used, the selection of ink and how the pen is washed is also important.)
Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!