Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Wednesday May 07 2014, @11:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the Hot-under-the-Collar dept.

Darryl Fears reports in the Washington Post that according to the government's newest national assessment of climate change, Americans are already feeling the effects of global warming. "For a long time we have perceived climate change as an issue that's distant, affecting just polar bears or something that matters to our kids," says Katharine Hayhoe, a Texas Tech University professor and lead co-author of the changing climate chapter of the assessment. "This shows it's not just in the future; it matters today. Many people are feeling the effects." The assessment carves the nation into sections and examines the impacts: More sea-level rise, flooding, storm surge, precipitation and heat waves in the Northeast; frequent water shortages and hurricanes in the Southeast and Caribbean; more drought and wildfires in the Southwest. "Residents of some coastal cities see their streets flood more regularly during storms and high tides. Inland cities near large rivers also experience more flooding, especially in the Midwest and Northeast. Insurance rates are rising in some vulnerable locations, and insurance is no longer available in others. Hotter and drier weather and earlier snow melt mean that wildfires in the West start earlier in the spring, last later into the fall, and burn more acreage. In Arctic Alaska, the summer sea ice that once protected the coasts has receded, and autumn storms now cause more erosion, threatening many communities with relocation."

The report concludes that over recent decades, climate science has advanced significantly and that increased scrutiny has led to increased certainty that we are now seeing impacts associated with human-induced climate change. "What is new over the last decade is that we know with increasing certainty that climate change is happening now. While scientists continue to refine projections of the future, observations unequivocally show that climate is changing and that the warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases. These emissions come mainly from burning coal, oil, and gas, with additional contributions from forest clearing and some agricultural practices."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by wantkitteh on Wednesday May 07 2014, @04:24PM

    by wantkitteh (3362) on Wednesday May 07 2014, @04:24PM (#40583) Homepage Journal

    It may come as a surprise to you, but coal power plants emits orders of magnitude more radiation into the atmosphere than nuclear ones produce waste - uranium exists as a trace element in coal, only 1ppm or so but given the amounts of coal we burn every year, that's a hell of a lot of nuclear waste we're already flinging around with gay abandon.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 08 2014, @05:29PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 08 2014, @05:29PM (#40964)

    oh i see!
    coal is bad because it can contain uranium so uhm .. let's just go straight to uranium?

    i'm not pro-coal per se but at least we have bio-nano-machines infesting this plan(e)t
    that can convert them exhaust volatiles to oxydizing agents for your daily jogging trip.

    matter of fact without that volatile this would be a barren planet.

    actually some people enjoy living in skeletal remains of structures build by above
    mentioned nano-machines ...

    on the other hand the volatiles from a "poison-production-plant" are just that. poison!
    nothing on this planet depends on it. if you could remove all uranium from this planet today
    i'll wager a bet that tomorrow nothing would go to hell ... unlike removing (not burning) all coal.