Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday December 30 2016, @09:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the will-provide-tattoos-for-right-applicant dept.

Seems someone got the whole thing seriously wrong, but evidently there was a casting call for actors for a Cadillac commercial that was looking for "alt-right" or "neo-nazi" types.

Cadillac caused a stir this week when a casting service put out a request on behalf of the American luxury brand looking to fill the role of an "alt-right (neo-Nazi)" in a new commercial. Cadillac denied it had ever authorized the notice and condemned it, while the casting company took responsibility, saying that it had been issued by mistake. Regardless of who did what, the idea had to have been hatched somewhere and by someone, which reveals something far more troubling than a mere streak of poor taste and even poorer judgement in corporate America: the marketability and mainstreaming of an alt-right population, or those "identified variously with anti-globalist and anti-immigrant stances, cartoon frogs, white nationalists, pick-up artists, anti-Semites, and a rising tide of right-wing populism," as Tablet contributor Jacob Siegel wrote in a profile of Paul Gottfried, the alt-right's "godfather."

Hmm, maybe now that the "alt-right" has become just another marketing demographic, we do not have to worry about them taking over the country? I mean, who buys Cadillacs as a status symbol anymore? Not like they are your father's Oldsmobile. Except that, really, it was your father's Olds. So that brand no longer exists. Are we at the point where we can say, "Brietbart: it's not your grandpa's fascism!"? Except, really, maybe it is?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:36PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @01:36PM (#447400)

    Not sure what you're trying to say here? Is that that we've trapped the black community in a cycle of poverty and despair in increasingly dense areas leaving violence as a means of gangs trying to exert some control over their lives as they enter adulthood. Or are you saying blacks are inherently violent because {something}?

    The former.

    Couldn't be the conditions cause the violence and not the other way around, could it?

    We already know the answer to this. Anti-social behaviour develops as a character trait. In it's most popular and somewhat crass form; "you can take the person out of the ghetto but you cannot take the ghetto out of the person". We don't need to rehash what has already been said hundreds of times. [soapboxie.com]

    The biggest start you can give your children in life is self-esteem. You do this by supporting them financially, emotionally and psychologically. Generations trapped in a cycle of state dependence has denied some even the most basic level of human dignity. Gangs are tribes; the aspiration and behaviour prevalent within democrat voting, poorer inner city communities is an exact match for the 3rd world.