Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday December 30 2016, @11:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the meet-the-google-police dept.

Last week an article from the BBC said:

Google has said it is 'thinking deeply' about ways to improve search, after criticism over how some results - including ones discussing the Holocaust - were ranked.

[...] Google - which processes five billion searches a day - was keen to come up with a solution that was broadly applicable across all searches, rather than just those that have been noticed by users.

"It's very easy to take a search here and there and demand Google change something," explained Mr Sullivan, "and then the next day you find a different search and say, 'why didn't you fix that?' "

This week we see the results of their efforts: Google has modified PageRank to surface "more high-quality, credible content on the web":

Google's technology was changed again after people spoke out about how typing in "are Jews evil" in the autocorrect function resulted in offensive terms. Also, when people searched "who runs Hollywood?" the result, "Jews," was scrubbed last year. Google said its algorithm incorrectly gave "authority" to a site that suggested so because it was linked to over and over again.

But Heidi Beirich, intelligence project director for the Southern Poverty Law Center, said Tuesday that Google has a long way to go to "clean up its act." While searching for "did the Holocaust happen?" no longer shows one white supremacist site at the top, searching for "is the Holocaust real?" still provides a site up high that claims it's a hoax.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday December 30 2016, @11:39PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday December 30 2016, @11:39PM (#447652) Homepage

    If Google's top search results regarding Jews are negative then either Google's algorithms are biased against Jews, or the majority of the searches regarding Jews are in a negative context.

    And if you've met a few of them, or are at least annoyed by how many poorly-acting and/or unfunny ones magically make it to popular stardom or the corporate boardroom through nepotism, then you'd be inclined to believe the latter.

    That's why Google is so fun. In Translate you can type in something "ooga booga looga oo oo" and it will autodetect Somalian and translate some if not all words.

    Like I've been saying this whole time, "life is not politically correct." When you rely on the input of the world's people to train your AI, the results are humiliating to some and utterly hilarious to others.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Offtopic=1, Troll=2, Insightful=1, Underrated=1, Total=5
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:47PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 30 2016, @11:47PM (#447654)

    So I typed in "Ethanol_fueled" into Google, and I got a "racist not found" message.

    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @12:11AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 31 2016, @12:11AM (#447661)

      Whats with all these trolls following ethanol anyway? You make him look rational in comparison.

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Pslytely Psycho on Saturday December 31 2016, @05:23AM

        by Pslytely Psycho (1218) on Saturday December 31 2016, @05:23AM (#447764)

        A king needs his court....

        --
        Alex Jones lawyer inspires new TV series: CSI Moron Division.
  • (Score: 0, Offtopic) by kurenai.tsubasa on Saturday December 31 2016, @02:02AM

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Saturday December 31 2016, @02:02AM (#447723) Journal

    Confirmed it goes for Somali, but the only thing it attempts to translate winds up as “which.” So for shits and giggles I punched in “Which witch is which?” and got “Waa kuwee saaxirad taasoo ah?” Wikipedia provides a sample of Somali speech [wikimedia.org] along with phonology [wikipedia.org] and the various writing systems [wikipedia.org] used, notably the Somali Latin alphabet [wikipedia.org].