SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Two SoylentNews readers sent us this story:
SpaceX concludes AMOS-6 explosion investigation
SpaceX has just released the concluding update to their investigation into the explosion that abruptly terminated the AMOS-6 while the rocket was still being fueled. It confirms the failure of a composite overwrapped pressure vessel inside the second stage LOX tank, and identifies several credible causes. SpaceX believes it now understands the problem well enough to avoid it going forward, and is hoping to return to flight with the Iridum NEXT launch on Jan 8.
SpaceX to Hopefully Resume Launches This Sunday
SpaceX has concluded its investigation into the September 1st accident and will attempt to return to launching satellites starting on January 8th:
An accident investigation team "concluded that one of the three composite overwrapped pressure vessels inside the second stage liquid oxygen tank failed," SpaceX said Monday in a statement on its website. The September failure was likely because of an oxygen buildup or a void in the buckle in the liner of the vessel, the company said.
At this time however SpaceX has not gotten the FAA's approval to resume operations.
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, which regulates commercial space ventures, still is reviewing the mishap.
"The FAA has not yet issued a license to SpaceX for a launch in January," the agency said by e-mail Tuesday.
Also at Ars Technica and USA Today.
Previously: Spacecom Seeks $50 Million or a Free Flight After SpaceX Rocket Explosion
NASA Advisory Committee Skeptical of SpaceX Manned Refueling Plan
SpaceX Identifies Cause of September Explosion
SpaceX Delays Launches to January
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @09:08AM
SpaceX to Hopefully Resume Launches This Sunday, January 8, 2017
That's better than dejectedly resuming launches.
Keep your chin up Elon!
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @09:24AM
Elong Musky is the bestest and I'm totally positive his massive cock is suckable. Is your mouth big enough for the Musky cock?
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @09:54AM
Unfortunately, no. It's only big enough for your micropenis.
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday January 04 2017, @05:37PM
I think the proper term should be to "anxiously resume launches".
If that one goes boom, or just imperfect, they're going to be in pain.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 04 2017, @10:49PM
Basically two completely separate subjects, each interesting
Will the FAA get a farm fuzzy and grant a launch permit by this weekend?
What evidence did X find that shows that reverting to the old fueling plan will fix the issue?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 05 2017, @05:20AM
The FAA can rubber stamp it. SpaceX have plenty of incentive to succeed, and any danger to the public is minimal.