Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday January 12 2017, @03:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the hiding-in-plain-view dept. - Video Script / Subtitles

By about 1970, some scientists were sitting around and they thought, "What in the world -- Look at these dinosaurs, they're all big. Where are all the little ones?"

And it comes down to a couple of things. First off, scientists have egos, and scientists like to name dinosaurs. They like to name anything. Everybody likes to have their own animal that they named.

Nobody noticed the gnarly stuff sort of looked alike. But they did look at these three and they said, "These are three different dinosaurs, and Dracorex is probably the most primitive of them. And the other one is more primitive than the other." It's unclear to me how they actually sorted these three of them out. But if you line them up, if you just take those three skulls and just line them up, they line up like this. Dracorex is the littlest one, Stygimoloch is the middle-size one, Pachycephalosaurus is the largest one. And one would think, that should give me a clue.

So if we cut open Dracorex -- I cut open our Dracorex -- and look, it was spongy inside, really spongy inside. I mean, it is a juvenile and it's growing really fast. So it is going to get bigger. If you cut open Stygimoloch, it is doing the same thing. The dome, that little dome, is growing really fast. It's inflating very fast. What's interesting is the spike on the back of the Dracorex was growing very fast as well. The spikes on the back of the Stygimoloch are actually resorbing, which means they're getting smaller as that dome is getting bigger. And if we look at Pachycephalosaurus, Pachycephalosaurus has a solid dome and its little bumps on the back of its head were also resorbing.

So just with these three dinosaurs, as a scientist, we can easily hypothesize that it is just a growth series of the same animal. Which of course means that Stygimoloch and Dracorex are extinct.

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday January 12 2017, @09:36PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Thursday January 12 2017, @09:36PM (#453076)

    > I'm sure no scientist wondered where the fossilized babies were, and then thought to cut open fossils they had to find the hidden babies inside or whatever they came up with as a reasonable solution.

    Well, there's a few steps missing in the summary, almost as though they were trying to hit the high points of a 15 minute video that is itself heavily summarized in only a couple paragraphs. Key steps left out:

      - hey, we know some species change skeletal structure dramatically as they change(modern examples listed), and these dinosaur skeletons look like they might be different stages in development of the same species

      - How could we tell? Well, everyone knows growing bone looks different than mature bone under a microscope, lets take a look at our fossils!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2