Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Snotnose on Tuesday January 17 2017, @06:50AM

    by Snotnose (1623) on Tuesday January 17 2017, @06:50AM (#454772)

    It's a crime what sciffy did to Farscape. It won awards and all that, but they had to cancel it not just after it hit it's stride, but had become must-see-TV.

    --
    When the dust settled America realized it was saved by a porn star.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JeanCroix on Tuesday January 17 2017, @08:54PM

    by JeanCroix (573) on Tuesday January 17 2017, @08:54PM (#455062)
    I seem to recall they axed it right around the time they veered toward reality tv territory. At least there was Peacekeeper Wars as an attempt at wrap up. Most prematurely cancelled shows don't get any sort of resolution at all.
    • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Wednesday January 18 2017, @05:05PM

      by Gaaark (41) on Wednesday January 18 2017, @05:05PM (#455515) Journal

      Yes, like Serenity: let's wrap the whole thing up by killing Wash, Book. Anybody else???

      Wish the powers that be would stop being and let quality TV just exist.
      Serenity was nice to have, but a cop out. They should have swallowed their own nuts and agreed to let it continue (and in a better way than they did with ST-TOS).

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
      • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday January 19 2017, @09:25PM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday January 19 2017, @09:25PM (#456240) Journal

        You know, everything would have been fine with that show if they had not insisted on naming like it was a feminine hygiene product. And then, they doubled down by naming the movie based on the series like another feminine hygiene product.

        Joss Whedon is great, and all, but man, do not name your sci-fi like feminine hygiene products if you want them to succeed.

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20 2017, @01:32AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20 2017, @01:32AM (#456330)

          Joss Whedon is great, and all, but man, do not name your sci-fi like feminine hygiene products if you want them to succeed.

          And don't cast an actor named Summer's Eve Glow to play your fan favorite character, right?

          Whedon's mistake was being ahead of the trend for radical feminist domination. If only he had waited another decade until after social media attracted all the women who have taken over the internet.

        • (Score: 2) by Marand on Saturday January 28 2017, @01:49PM

          by Marand (1081) on Saturday January 28 2017, @01:49PM (#459874) Journal

          And then he doubled down by later naming a series Dollhouse. [wikipedia.org]

          Which I actually liked, for the most part. Didn't care much for the apocalyptic future parts that got weaved in late in each season, however; it felt like it was tacked on to give the show a feeling of completion in case it got axed. Pretty smart thing to assume, considering it was sci-fi, on Fox, by Joss Whedon.