Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday January 19 2017, @08:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the reduce-the-size-of-your-pron-storage dept.

With unlimited data plans becoming increasingly expensive, or subscribers being forced to ditch their unlimited data due to overuse, anything that can reduce the amount of data we download is welcome. This is especially true for media including images or video, and Google just delivered a major gain when it comes to viewing images online.

The clever scientists at Google Research have come up with a new technique for keeping image size to an absolute minimum without sacrificing quality. So good is this new technique that it promises to reduce the size of an image on disk by as much as 75 percent.

The new technique is called RAISR, which stands for "Rapid and Accurate Image Super-Resolution." Typically, reducing the size of an image means lowering its quality or resolution. RAISR works by taking a low-resolution image and upsampling it, which basically means enhancing the detail using filtering. Anyone who's ever tried to do this manually knows that the end result looks a little blurred. RAISR avoids that thanks to machine learning.

[...] RAISR has been trained using low and high quality versions of images. Machine learning allows the system to figure out the best filters to recreate the high quality image using only the low quality version. What you end up with after lots of training is a system that can do the same high quality upsampling on most images without needing the high quality version for reference.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Immerman on Friday January 20 2017, @12:26AM

    by Immerman (3985) on Friday January 20 2017, @12:26AM (#456310)

    It's true that you can't restore information that's been removed. But it's also true that there's far more information in your average image than you will notice without exhaustive examination. If done right, those two truth may largely counteract each other.

    I wouldn't trust the detail in an upscaled image for anything important, but how often is there anything important in the details of an image on a web page? How often do you even pay any attention to the detail?

    Meanwhile, even simple bi-cubic upscaling can often reveal a great deal of information that was already present, but heavily obscured by the pixilated noise introduced by rendering pixels as colored blocks rather than sampling points.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3