Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Sunday January 29 2017, @12:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the stop-thinking-that-you're-a-dictator dept.

The Intercept reports

A Federal judge in New York issued a nationwide temporary injunction [1], halting the implementation of President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration on Saturday night, blocking the deportation of travelers with valid visas detained at airports in the past 24 hours.

Judge Ann Donnelly, a United States District Court Judge in Brooklyn, issued the ruling at an emergency hearing on a lawsuit [2] filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups on Saturday, as Trump's executive order temporarily banning citizens of seven nations with Muslim majorities from entering the U.S. took immediate effect.

The judge ruled that the government must immediately stop deporting travelers from those nations, including refugees who already went through a rigorous vetting process, and provide a complete list of all those detained, immigrants rights lawyer Lee Gelernt told reporters in Brooklyn.

[Ed Note (martyb): Original text and links from The Intercept are reproduced here — to bypass indirections and Javascript use the following links.]

[1] Direct link to a PDF of the Emergency Motion for Stay of Removal (Case 1:17-cv-00480 Document 8 Filed 01/28/17).
[2] Direct link to a PDF of the Original ACLU Complaint (Case 1:17-cv-00480 Document 1 Filed 01/28/17).

Previously:
Breaking News: Immigration Ban Includes Green Card Holders


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by BsAtHome on Sunday January 29 2017, @02:27PM

    by BsAtHome (889) on Sunday January 29 2017, @02:27PM (#460237)

    The European Union has promptly responded to the new style of government in the USA by president Trump. As of 12:00 noon today, Sunday January 29 2017, no US citizens with a known christian belief may enter any of the European Union countries on suspicion that they may be planning Americanization campaigns. An exception is made for US citizens with native American and Mexican or Latino backgrounds, as well as US citizens with a different skin-color than white. Permanent residents of the EU with US papers, not falling in the exception categories, will be deported at the earliest convenience and on their own expense.

    Luckily, the CJEU has a day off on Sundays, so all police and immigration staff may proceed without judicial intervention. It is expected that the courts will be kept in check for at least a couple of months, such that a clean house is to be expected before any potential adverse ruling may be entered in the record.

    /s

    Let the mud-fights begin...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Offtopic=1, Insightful=2, Funny=3, Overrated=1, Total=7
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @03:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @03:53PM (#460261)

    As of 12:00 noon today, Sunday January 29 2017, no US citizens with a known christian belief may enter any of the European Union countries on suspicion that they may be planning Americanization campaigns.

    Why American Christians? They have no recent history of violently attempting to overthrow governments and instill a theocracy, nor the divine mandate to do so. If anything, we should ban US politicians [wikipedia.org] instead.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @03:57PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @03:57PM (#460263)

      > and instill a theocracy,

      That depends. American christians have been working their asses off to turn Uganda and other african nations into theocracy. [thenation.com]

      • (Score: 2) by Sulla on Sunday January 29 2017, @04:09PM

        by Sulla (5173) on Sunday January 29 2017, @04:09PM (#460272) Journal

        Seems to me they suck at it. Islam has been doing a great job in Africa.

        --
        Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday January 29 2017, @10:31PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday January 29 2017, @10:31PM (#460431) Journal
        Your post does demonstrate the absurdity of the rationales. If I can make blanket characterizations and exaggerations about all Muslims on the basis of the actions of a few, why not the same as in your post?
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @06:26PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @06:26PM (#460331)

      Well, here in the US those believers in Christ tend to blow up abortion clinics so I'm sure the EU is worried about increased terror attacks. The Christians also support inequality for homosexual people so I'm sure Europe is wary of having such narrow minded preachers of hate affecting their youth. American Christians also tend to be loud, disagreeable, and judgmental so for the public peace they will be banned. There are also a lot of Muslims coming to Europe recently and the EU probably my wants to keep them safe from the likely violence/murder by American Christians who smuggled their favorite guns over to help "deal with the Muslim problem." Hell, American Christians are the leading cause of most of the problems in the middle east. Europe just doesn't want to be the battleground for the next crusades!

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:18PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:18PM (#460361)

        Except that's not a systemic problem.

        33% of UK college educated Muslim students believe in the implementation of a worldwide Caliphate.
        Only 53% categorically reject murder in the name of Islam.
        40% support the implementation of Sharia in the UK.
        6% believe that apostates should be punished according to Sharia. This means killed.
        Only 29% believe Islam is fully compatible with western democracy.
        Only 18% believe it's fully compatible with the separation between church and state.

        That's well-educated educated young people who are mostly native born UK citizens, not some country bumpkin from Arkansas.
        Source [globalmbwatch.com]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @08:11PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @08:11PM (#460381)

      Sure they do. They overthrew America. Ask any native.

    • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Monday January 30 2017, @11:47AM

      by TheRaven (270) on Monday January 30 2017, @11:47AM (#460606) Journal
      Speaking as someone who grew up in England in the '80s and '90s, I was happy when Christian Americans of Irish descent stopped funding a terrorist organisation that planted bombs in my country targeting civilians on a fairly regular basis. Apparently something happened in New York in 2001 that made funding terrorists unfashionable. We've had a lot less terrorism here since Christian Americans stopped funding it.
      --
      sudo mod me up
  • (Score: 2) by Sulla on Sunday January 29 2017, @04:13PM

    by Sulla (5173) on Sunday January 29 2017, @04:13PM (#460273) Journal

    The individual EU states are soverign. If they don't want me thats their right. Guess it wont apply because I am not christian, but I am plenty white enough to be banned from new Europe.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @04:50PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @04:50PM (#460293)

      Its pretty sad how racists suck so badly at humor.

      • (Score: 2) by BsAtHome on Sunday January 29 2017, @05:58PM

        by BsAtHome (889) on Sunday January 29 2017, @05:58PM (#460321)

        Taking this particular thread seriously is a bad sign of the state of the human race. The hyperbole is exactly what we need to put things in perspective.

        • (Score: 1) by fritsd on Monday January 30 2017, @11:54AM

          by fritsd (4586) on Monday January 30 2017, @11:54AM (#460609) Journal

          "The tyrant fears the laugh more than the assassin's bullet" - Heinlein

          Well done taking the piss, BsAtHome!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @10:55AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @10:55AM (#460590)

      Funny. Plenty of European countries will reject your visa because you are not white enough. Which universe are you from? In this universe white people instituted colonialism. In this universe a black husband can have his visa denied while his white wife will get it. In this universe non-schengen European countries will reject your fully detailed tourist visa application for not being white (and that includes Britain, not just eastern Europe).

  • (Score: 2, Troll) by jmorris on Sunday January 29 2017, @05:00PM

    by jmorris (4844) on Sunday January 29 2017, @05:00PM (#460297)

    I really wish they would be so stupid. The EU wouldn't last a month past the day they did something that obvious. Remember the whole scheme depends on keeping the masses in Europe asleep while the New World Order is birthing, there are already far too many signs of people waking up and asking "where the Hell did my Country go?"

    • (Score: 2) by BsAtHome on Sunday January 29 2017, @06:03PM

      by BsAtHome (889) on Sunday January 29 2017, @06:03PM (#460324)

      Besides the point that the EU does not have such authority, the individual countries are currently on their merry way to undermine themselves. The populists in the EU countries are already changing the landscape and, apparently, nobody is able to hold against the obvious fallacy of the populist premise. These are are both sad and exciting times. Lets hope that reason wins before a new war is required to reestablish reason.

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:23PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29 2017, @07:23PM (#460366)

      You have no country, jmorris! Remember? You are a lizard person from beyond the stars!

  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Sunday January 29 2017, @05:15PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Sunday January 29 2017, @05:15PM (#460303) Journal

    Canadians may come and go as they want.
    'Cause.

    Man, we are loved! :)

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. I have always been here. ---Gaaark 2.0 --
  • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Sunday January 29 2017, @10:32PM

    by krishnoid (1156) on Sunday January 29 2017, @10:32PM (#460432)

    on suspicion that they may be planning Americanization campaigns. An exception is made for ... US citizens with a different skin-color than white.

    No no no!!! Why would you want to make an exception for him? He's the cause of the problem in the first place!

  • (Score: 2) by Username on Monday January 30 2017, @12:36AM

    by Username (4557) on Monday January 30 2017, @12:36AM (#460452)

    Just goes to prove leftist are ok with banning people based on religion, which Trump has never done. Because it’s only correct if they do it.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @11:22AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @11:22AM (#460596)

      Dude, get a sense of humor.

      Er, sorry, my condolences. I forget that this actually happened in the paranoid delusion you prefer to live in.

  • (Score: 2) by SanityCheck on Monday January 30 2017, @12:43AM

    by SanityCheck (5190) on Monday January 30 2017, @12:43AM (#460456)

    And then in few months retarded ban is reversed when all those countries had their governments voted out of power.

    Either way EU has made itself irrelevant, and it probably won't last the next four years. At one point I liked the idea, but after years of stupidity I say good riddance!

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday January 30 2017, @01:11PM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 30 2017, @01:11PM (#460627) Journal

      Unlike yourself, I never "liked" the idea. Several Sci-Fi stories have explored that whole one-world-government idea. None of them work out well. In the 1940's a group of people were persecuted by a government, but as horrible as that persecution was, the vast majority of that group of people actually SURVIVED. There were other countries to go to, there were escape routes, there were people willing to hide some of them. In a totalitarian world government, there will be no escape routes. So, the next charismatic son of a bitch who takes a serious dislike to some group of people will be able to eradicate them. Extinct. Gone. The last of the Mohicans. Nevermore. And, at the rate things are going in the world today, it's likely to be all white people of European descent who are targeted. Maybe some of the swarthier Mediterranean and Slavik people will be exempted, but no more peach-colored skin, no blue eyes, absolutely no blonde hair.

      THAT is the power of a one-world-government. THAT is the power that the UN wishes it could weild. And, THAT is the path that the EU is tentatively exploring today.

      --
      “I have become friends with many school shooters” - Tampon Tim Walz
      • (Score: 2) by SanityCheck on Monday January 30 2017, @06:52PM

        by SanityCheck (5190) on Monday January 30 2017, @06:52PM (#460744)

        I'm not going to argue because that is what it has become. But on the onset the ideas and hopes that myself and other Europeans had were vastly different than to execution. No one would agree to one world government type of nonsense from the onset. We, as in Europeans, just wanted to be closer to our peaceful neighbors. The idea of a landmass the size of Europe living together in harmony is just not that far fetched, I live in the US and the country as a whole gets on quite fine. No sane European would ever want to include the whole world, and not even all of Europe - it would be silly to have Turkey join after all, and Russia has identity too strong to tack onto something else. But the whole thing got hijacked by agendas galore, and turned into the absurdity we now have. So when it turned out to be a tumor, it means it must now be cut out. I foresee smaller unions between countries that are very similar forming out of the remnants, and those countries will definitely not be taking in refugees.