SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-city-mosque-gun-shots-1.3957686
Two men were arrested following last night's shooting at a Quebec City mosque that left six people dead and 19 wounded, in what Quebec's premier described as a "murderous act directed at a specific community."
Thirty-nine people escaped the Centre Culturel Islamique de Québec (Islamic cultural centre of Quebec) in the Sainte-Foy neighbourhood without injuries, according to Quebec provincial police Sgt. Christine Coulombe.
Initially, it was reported that eight people were wounded, but authorities updated that number to 19 Monday morning.
Five were still in critical condition in hospital Monday morning, including three people who are in intensive care. Another 13 people have been released, according to a hospital spokesperson.
Coulombe said the people who died in the shooting, which occurred during Sunday evening prayers, ranged in age from 35 to 70.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Monday January 30 2017, @09:04PM
I sure did hear the "Allahu Ackbar" lie, but I think it was on the alt-right outlet BBC News [bbc.com].
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @09:09PM
It should be easy to tell what's fake news and what's not. If we don't hear anything more about this shooting from the press, the shooter was Moslem. If we don't hear about more from the RWNJs (or if they twist the narrative to blame the victims because how dare they engage in free exercise of religion), the shooter was Christian.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by choose another one on Monday January 30 2017, @09:16PM
The "facts" have repeatedly changed on this one, on multiple major news sites, at a guess it is major incident confusion and "nobody is sure what happened yet" behind it rather than conspiracy by SJW / alt-right / whatever.
Apparently a moroccan immigrant _was_ arrested but has _now_ been released, and the other suspect is white canadian - but that is just what the news is saying at the moment. Could all change tomorrow.
Sometimes it is better to just sit and wait until the people on the scene have sorted out what happened before commenting.
(Score: 5, Informative) by ikanreed on Monday January 30 2017, @09:19PM
The Moroccan man was detained as a primary witness. That's not the same as being arrested as a suspect.
(Score: 3, Informative) by choose another one on Monday January 30 2017, @10:32PM
That is not what has been reported by multiple news outlets though.
Reuters: "A man of Moroccan descent who had also been arrested"
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-canada-mosque-shooting-toll-idUSKBN15E0F6 [reuters.com]
Mirror, quoting local source TVA (in french, though translation looks correct to me):
"Mohamed el Khadir, reportedly of Moroccan origin, has been arrested"
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/first-picture-quebec-gunman-who-9722588 [mirror.co.uk]
http://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2017/01/30/les-deux-suspects-sont-alexandre-bissonnette-et-mohamed-khadir [tvanouvelles.ca]
Also note the last url - les-deux-suspects = the two suspects.
Looks like he _is_ a witness _now_ but _was_ arrested, as a _suspect_. It isn't hard to speculate how that could have happened.
But maybe you have other references?
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Monday January 30 2017, @11:01PM
Fair enough. I concede that saying he was arrested was a perfectly reasonable thing to do.
(Score: 5, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Monday January 30 2017, @09:28PM
Sometimes it is better to just sit and wait until the people on the scene have sorted out what happened before commenting.
Tell that to the White House!
It is usually the case that there is significant confusion in the wake of attacks of this sort. And local police did apparently arrest two suspects at first: both Bissonnette along with el Khadir. And until the investigation is complete, one cannot know for certain what the motives here were. One should be careful about trying to infer too much from a hodgepodge of Facebook “likes” and, this early, even anecdotal claims about his political views. As for reports that someone yelled “Allahu akbar,” it is perfectly natural that someone in a mosque would say that upon seeing a homicidal killer randomly shooting people, or it’s possible that the shooter said it mockingly.
But this is exactly why no responsible news organization, let alone the White House, should rush to depict the shooter as Muslim and of Moroccan descent when so little is known about what happened. Yet not only did Fox and the Trump White House do exactly that, but worse, neither has retracted or corrected their claims long after it became clear that it was false:
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @10:42PM
Know what is more sicking than the killings?
One group hoping Muslims did it.
The other group hoping a white guy did it.
Then both groups setting up to quickly blame the other because they both decided to jump in and fill in the narrative they wanted.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday January 31 2017, @07:03PM
Know what is more sicking than the killings?
One group hoping Muslims did it.
The other group hoping a white guy did it.
Yeah, it's bad from random blowhards on the internet.
It is many orders of magnitude worse when the President of the US is hoping the Muslims did it so bad he's willing to lie to you about it.
(Score: 2) by digitalaudiorock on Tuesday January 31 2017, @12:47AM
That's because Trump is still in campaign mode rather than POTUS mode and primarily wants to appeal to his base...the ones who won't care or even notice if it turns out the real killer was a guy who liked Trump on facebook. The fact that Trumps ban will accomplish nothing more than ISIS propaganda makes no difference to him either, as even that, in a perverse way will likely make matters worse and in the process help to "make his case". Troll mod me if you want, but that really is my take on everything I'm seeing, This guy is even more scary than he is petty and immature.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @10:37PM
Sometimes it is better to just sit and wait until the people on the scene have sorted out what happened before commenting
But then where will I put my internet rage?!
(Score: 3, Funny) by number6x on Monday January 30 2017, @10:59PM
Put it where it belongs. Vi vs Emacs [wikipedia.org].
Until the apostic users of the wrong, infernal, demonic editor are wiped from the internets, we will never achieve neutrality.
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Monday January 30 2017, @11:43PM
Vi/Vim is for lusers.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 31 2017, @12:36AM
Infidel! Your choice of an editor is a travesty and reflects in your personality, grooming and offspring. Mine is the only true editor.
(Score: 2) by edIII on Monday January 30 2017, @09:25PM
I'm having some difficulty in understanding why an Islamic terrorist attacked a mosque. That is not something they typically do is it? Perhaps I'm not exposed to enough foreign news, but I'm not able to recall any incident in which radical Islam was taking out people in mosques. Streets, malls, bazaars, even hospitals, but not where dutiful and faithful Muslims are actually praying to Allah.
I'm very curious about what actually happened.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Monday January 30 2017, @09:36PM
It's not what happened in this case, but that does happen.
And in those cases it happens for much the same reason your slightly-off evangelical Uncle thinks Catholics are trying to take over the country: marginal distinctions in theology are blown into massive extraordinary differences in identity.
(Score: 4, Informative) by bob_super on Monday January 30 2017, @09:39PM
They do that all the time in the US-war-torn countries in the Middle-East, blowing up the mosque of another branch (Shia vs Sunni, typically).
Car bomb at the end of the Friday prayer is sadly a great way to perpetuate a sectarian war.
In Canada, that's quite far-fetched...
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Monday January 30 2017, @09:30PM
White Supremacist or Muslim could and maybe would have shouted "Allahu Achbar" while shooting down his victims. The supremacist in mockery of Islam, the Muslim in all seriousness, for religious purposes.
I believe the shooter probably did shout it out.
Alternative für Deutschland
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @11:19PM
White Supremacist or Muslim
Or, coulda been a run of the mill hillbilly Quebequois or redneck Arkansawsan who is hateful and scared. Strange how much the two populations have in common.
(Score: 2) by kazzie on Monday January 30 2017, @09:38PM
The trouble is that shouting "Allahu Akbar" isn't necessarily indicative these days. Heck, in a school where I work, many (disruptive) kids will yell the phrase on occasion, probably to be controversial or edgy. (I hope it hasn't reached même stage yet.)
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30 2017, @10:35PM
Or, you know, if you are a muslim and you think you are about to be killed you might want to make a quick prayer to God.
(Score: 2) by tibman on Tuesday January 31 2017, @02:47PM
I've also heard the younglings shout it. Seems to be a replacement for "YOLO". I'm still a fan of "Leeeeroy!" but that only works before you do the dumb thing.
SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Monday January 30 2017, @11:40PM
It's also possible the attackers would purposely yell "Allahu Ackbar" to make it appear that they are Muslims. Possibly in attempt to throw off authorities by leading them to believe they were looking for brown people.