SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
posted by
janrinok
on Sunday February 05 2017, @07:31PM
from the diminished-user-base-on-old-boxes dept.
from the diminished-user-base-on-old-boxes dept.
The privacy-centric TAILS Linux distro (The Amnesic Incognito Live System) announces:
Tails 3.0 will require a 64-bit x86-64 compatible processor. As opposed to older versions of Tails, it will not work on 32-bit processors.
We have waited for years until we felt it was the right time to do this switch. Still, this was a hard decision for us to make.
[...] Our current goal is to release Tails 3.0, and stop supporting computers with a 32-bit processor, on June 13, 2017.
Announced February 1: Tails 2.10 is out.
The site's news page (which could REALLY use #FragmentIdentifiers MUCH more effectively) says:
Tails 2.11 is scheduled for March 3rd.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
TAILS 3.0 Will Require a 64-Bit Processor
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 23 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Counting in octal is just like counting in decimal--if you don't use your thumbs.
-- Tom Lehrer
(Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Sunday February 05 2017, @08:47PM
According to tech.support@amd.com
"I would like to inform you that PSP technology is available only with selected A-Series APUs and E-Series APUs.
There is no PSP technology in FX series Processors."
PSP being AMD's answer to ME/TPM.
Have to trust something.
Of course, this does nothing for the huge swathes of the world's population who have older machines and no access to upgrades.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday February 05 2017, @08:59PM
I don't think AMD is using the FX codename for Zen/Ryzen chips:
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-am4-processor-family-leak-r7-1800x-flagship/ [wccftech.com]
PSP has been renamed to AMD Secure Processor, so that might hurt your search for answers.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 05 2017, @09:51PM
AM4 *DOES* have PSP/SP.
Meaning 2-3 generation old intel hardware is the best you can get and mostly disable the Management Engine/Security Processor.
For AMD 2nd Gen G34 chips, or AM3+ chips are the best you can get on the AMD side (with ECC), or FM2 (not +!) on the consumer side.
Anything newer from either company has non-microcode signed firmware binaries running unknown software on secondary processors, many of which have unrestricted, or unrestrictable access to main memory, and in some cases complete use of the IO bus without CPU/chipset notification to the OS.
This is a dark time for computing, unless RISC-V or SH/J chips get released in a desktop/notebook featureset. All the current alternatives either have their own signed management processor implementation, or lack the memory/io bus options to allow full system construction.
Secondarily we need an open source gpu taped to complement it. There are at least two projects out which might cover this, at least one of which should allow OG3 or OGL4 level support with sufficient speed and memory for a composited desktop but not 3d gaming without further refinements.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 05 2017, @10:30PM
Of course, this does nothing for the huge swathes of the world's population who have older machines and no access to upgrades.
Considering how many of these people are EXACTLY the target audience for T(A)ILS, this really is a head scratcher of a change at this point. I know people who still use 32 bit computers as their primary computers here in the United States. They're not big modern gamers, and generally just browse the web and perform basic office functions along with text based protocols (irc, email, etc). For the use case for many people, they're perfectly fine, functional computers. The idea that someone in most oppressive regimes (particularly one who is working against the power structure) can necessarily afford to upgrade a computer that otherwise still works fine seems a bit poorly thought through. And while perhaps other distros with different aims could say "so just use the older version and maybe take some extra firewall measures", that idea would just be plain silly with T(A)ILS, as out of date privacy software may as well be no software at all, in many cases.
Eventually being 64 bit only is a sensible move, but I really must say I think it's too early.
Perhaps a decent alternative (or supplement) to going this route would be to roll out a build-your-own-iso script/tool to support varying architectures. Especially with Apple now looking at making more use of ARM chips, we may have to admit that the days of an architectural monoculture are behind us.
(Score: 1) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Monday February 06 2017, @03:26AM
Maybe their chosen web-browsers are dropping 32-bit support.