Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Thursday February 16 2017, @01:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the more-data-to-not-be-evil-with dept.

TechSpecs Blog ponders:

I decided to dig through open source to examine the state of Google's upcoming Andromeda OS. For anyone unfamiliar, Andromeda seems to be the replacement for both Android and Chrome OS (cue endless debates over the semantics of that, and what it all entails). Fuchsia is the actual name of the operating system, while Magenta is the name of the kernel, or more correctly, the microkernel. Many of the architectural design decisions appear to have unsurprisingly been focused on creating a highly scalable platform.

It goes without saying that Google isn't trying to hide Fuchsia. People have clearly discovered that Google is replacing Android's Linux kernel. Still, I thought it would be interesting for people to get a better sense of what the OS actually is. This article is only intended to be an overview of the basics, as far as I can comment reasonably competently. (I certainly never took an operating systems class!)

To my naive eyes, rather than saying Chrome OS is being merged into Android, it looks more like Android and Chrome OS are both being merged into Fuchsia. It's worth noting that these operating systems had previously already begun to merge together to an extent, such as when the Android team worked with the Chrome OS team in order to bring Update Engine to Nougat, which introduced A/B updates to the platform.

Google is unsurprisingly bringing up Andromeda on a number of platforms, including the humble Intel NUC. ARM, x86, and MIPS bring-up is exactly what you would expect for an Android successor, and it also seems clear that this platform will run on Intel laptops.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by bob_super on Thursday February 16 2017, @01:56AM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday February 16 2017, @01:56AM (#467688)

    Sure, you can bring a new OS to take over the world. Three things:
      - Security. From day 1
      - Easy to get executables for it (compatibility layers or well-fed app store)
      - Don't you [bleep]ing expect all form factors to use the same interface.

    Good luck.

    PS: if you fail, you have to fix all the Android fragmentation and security issues. If you succeed, you still have to fix all the Android security issues.
    PPS: Don't bake the spyware in.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @02:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @02:57AM (#467695)

    Don't want the spyware? Here's the cleaned version.

    begin 644 andromeda-sans-spyware
    `
    end

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Thursday February 16 2017, @03:04AM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 16 2017, @03:04AM (#467698) Journal

    I don't think that Android is any less "secure" than Linux. The problem with Android is, who "owns" the device, and thus the OS. If your telco "owns" the device, and lets you use it for a fee, then the OS can be considered at least moderately secure, from their point of view. Relatively few of us actually root our phones, to take real ownership of the phone. Most phones continue to report statistics back to the telco and/or the manufacturer for all of their useful lives. That's pretty "secure" from their point of view. If other apps gain root, and report the user's data to third parties, that is inconsequential to the telco.

    The business model needs to change, before end users can consider their phones to be secure. I'm not an Apple fan, but those people have a much better perspective on security than the Android crowd does. The end user owns the phone, if they agree to stay inside the garden. He still owns the phone, if he goes outside the garden, but there are consequences for wandering around outside. Still, the phone stays pretty secure.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @02:03PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @02:03PM (#467778)
      The end user owns the phone?! Don't make me laugh. Apple has always truly owned the phone, just as much if not more than any Android phone is owned by its manufacturer or telco.
      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday February 17 2017, @04:19PM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 17 2017, @04:19PM (#468250) Journal

        I gave your post a little thought, off and on. Didn't Apple tell Big Brother to take a leap, because they couldn't break into a phone? At the least, Apple respects your ownership of a phone enough to refuse to be a party to spying on you. Apple's phone, or your phone? Whichever, it's a better deal than you're going to get on the average smart phone.

  • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by captain normal on Thursday February 16 2017, @04:07AM

    by captain normal (2205) on Thursday February 16 2017, @04:07AM (#467712)

    Why, oh why would Google host a new OS on Github?

    --
    When life isn't going right, go left.
  • (Score: 2) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Thursday February 16 2017, @04:59AM

    by fido_dogstoyevsky (131) <axehandleNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Thursday February 16 2017, @04:59AM (#467719)

    Sure, you can bring a new OS to take over the world. Three things:
        - Security. From day 1
        - Easy to get executables for it (compatibility layers or well-fed app store)
        - Don't you [bleep]ing expect all form factors to use the same interface.

      - Root access without having to do more than either login as root or su as a user
      - Any GNU/Linux (or BSD) software that works on my Atom netbook works on Fuschia

    --
    It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @07:48AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @07:48AM (#467739)

      - An OS completely free from proprietary blobs. In other words, freedom (and likely security) from day 1.

  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @08:47PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 16 2017, @08:47PM (#467950)

    It also helps if you give it ample targets for pejorative nicknames. I think that fucksya is rather appropriate given the company.