Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Thursday February 16 2017, @09:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the invest-in-gold dept.

[Ed note: Updated to include actual examples of how some Indians dodged the clampdown. --martyb]

On November 8, 2016, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a shock decision declared all 500 and 1,000 rupee notes to be "worthless pieces of paper" from midnight onwards. This surprise demonetisation sucked out 86 percent of cash from circulation, ostensibly in an attempt to flush out unaccounted wealth, or "black money".

More than one billion Indians had less than eight weeks to return all of their old notes. For the nation's largely cash-based society, this unprecedented move induced a period of chaos. Banks scrambled to keep up while lines trailed out their doors and around street corners. Life's basic daily transactions screeched to a standstill as people struggled to withdraw cash, causing immense stress and even death in some cases.

[...] "As far as my business is concerned, we were never affected, nor are we going to be affected," says Sunil*, a young businessman with garment factories on the suburb outside of New Delhi. Though he had stored hundreds of thousands of rupees in untaxed cash, he claims demonetisation left him without any significant losses.

[...] He contacted his suppliers and purchased fabrics in advance, all in 500 and 1,000 rupee notes worth $7.4 and $14.8 respectively. He said that for him, this was "the main source of getting rid of old currency notes".

Of Sunil's 400 employees, many are low-paid tailors and labourers that normally receive cash payments. He decided to give them all hefty cash advances, also in old notes.

[Continues...]

[...] Uraaj*, a casino manager who was sitting on a substantial stack of untaxed cash, says he paid the trusted members of his house staff six months in advance as one way to dispose of his money.

In situations where there are pronounced power dynamics between employers and employees, it can be difficult for a labourer to refuse advance payments. "It’s actually like indentured servitude. You are kind of sugar-coating it when you say, I’m paying you in advance for three months," says Udayan Baijal, a Delhi-based filmmaker.

[...] Some people seized the opportunity to pay off debts in cash. Ramya Pothuri, a 20-year-old singer-songwriter from Mumbai, had not received payment for months from the restaurant where she performs weekly. After demonetisation, the restaurant manager "dumped 40K on [her]" in old notes.

"At first, I was like, no," she says, "because I didn’t want to go to the bank and stand in that line. But I knew that if I didn’t take that cash then, it would take ages for me to get paid".

Other black money hoarders paid professionals to change their currency. Ashish*, who works for a political party, claimed he sent 3 million rupees to his contact within a bank, who exchanged the currency for a 35 percent commission.

*Names have been changed to protect identities.

Could a better designed demonetisation tactic help elsewhere?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday February 16 2017, @10:03PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 16 2017, @10:03PM (#467984) Journal

    They have clearly not gotten 100% of the black money. But if they got 90% of it, for example, would you still say that it didn't work?

    I'd still say that it didn't work even if they got 100% of the "black money". There are more important things out there, such as a stable money supply and the well-being of your citizens that is more important. There are huge costs to doing dumb things with your money supply.

    In addition, my view though is that they probably didn't break 10% of the black money, because it's not in Indian currency. The very premise is so profoundly stupid you have to wonder what the real game was.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 17 2017, @06:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 17 2017, @06:28AM (#468111)

    By now we should all realize, the goal is to move all financial transactions into formats that are easily tracked. Such moves tear me in two. On one hand you get control of financial transactions which allows the gov to more easily find criminals of various sorts, money laundering becomes much more difficult. This seems like a good thing, allowing the government to find people who operate outside the social boundaries. However, such information can be used as power to control/blackmail anyone. It forces people into digital transactions which are easily tracked.

    Sure it helps fight crime, but living under the eye of Sauron is a terrible price to pay. I'd rather rely on actual police work to fight crime.

    Incidentally: khallow how old are you?

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday February 17 2017, @08:44AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 17 2017, @08:44AM (#468138) Journal

      This seems like a good thing, allowing the government to find people who operate outside the social boundaries.

      Not seeing why "operate outside the social boundaries" should be under the thumb of government.

      Incidentally: khallow how old are you?

      Upper forties.